← All companies ← LAND Manual LANDP → ← LAND REITs — Specialty & Diversified LANDP →
LANDO, Gladstone Land Corp
We are an externally-managed, agricultural real estate investment trust that is primarily in the business of owning and leasing farmland, including through lease structures with a variable rent component based on the gross revenues generated from certain farms in lieu of fixed base rent.
We are managed by our external adviser, Gladstone Management Corporation (the "Adviser"), and Gladstone Administration, LLC (the "Administrator"), provides administrative services to us.
The Series E Preferred Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange, and there is currently no public market for shares of this security.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
Next report Est. 11/2–11/12 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 45 days of period end · has filed ~41 days after · the wire records it on arrival
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Operating cash per share has shrunk (−15% a year). The dividend takes 80% of FFO, and is covered. Debt is 41% of assets, moderate for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $17M | $25M | $37M | $41M | $57M | $75M | $89M | $90M | $85M | $88M | $88M | RevenueRevenue |
| $448K | ($31K) | $3M | $2M | $5M | $3M | $5M | $15M | $13M | $14M | ($6M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $5M | $7M | $9M | $13M | $17M | $27M | $35M | $37M | $35M | $35M | $36M | Depreciation & amortizationD&A |
| $8M | $7M | $10M | $21M | $25M | $32M | $44M | $40M | $30M | $7M | $28M | Cash from operationsOp. cash |
| $5M | $6M | $8M | $10M | $12M | $16M | $19M | $20M | $20M | $20M | $22M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| 59% | 98% | 79% | 49% | 48% | 51% | 43% | 49% | 68% | 293% | 80% | Dividend / operating cashPayout |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| ($96M) | ($130M) | ($94M) | ($263M) | ($273M) | ($295M) | ($85M) | ($4M) | $63M | $84M | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| $87M | $124M | $95M | $240M | $243M | $270M | $86M | ($79M) | ($93M) | ($82M) | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| ($95K) | $500K | $12M | ($1M) | ($4M) | $7M | $44M | ($43M) | ($296K) | $9M | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $337M | $466M | $563M | $827M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | Real estate (gross)RE gross |
| $334M | $462M | $565M | $817M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | Total assetsAssets |
| 62% | 65% | 59% | 59% | 58% | 49% | 43% | 41% | 40% | 38% | 41% | Debt / assetsDebt/assets |
| $207M | $301M | $336M | $482M | $624M | $668M | $627M | $574M | $528M | $474M | $486M | Total debtDebt |
| $205M | $298M | $321M | $468M | $615M | $651M | $565M | $556M | $509M | $446M | $463M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $6M | $10M | $12M | $16M | $21M | $25M | $26M | $24M | $22M | $20M | $19M | Interest expenseInt. exp. |
| 1.2× | 1.2× | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.6× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $246M | $344M | $384M | $538M | $683M | $762M | $726M | $668M | $625M | $569M | — | Total liabilitiesTotal liab. |
| $77M | $110M | $176M | $277M | $384M | $587M | $731M | $720M | $687M | $670M | $673M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 10.0M | 12.1M | 15.5M | 19.6M | 22.3M | 30.4M | 34.6M | 35.7M | 35.9M | 36.5M | 41.9M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $0.50 | $0.53 | $0.53 | $0.53 | $0.54 | $0.54 | $0.55 | $0.55 | $0.56 | $0.56 | $0.53 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $7.66 | $9.12 | $11.37 | $14.11 | $17.24 | $19.33 | $21.16 | $20.14 | $19.14 | $18.36 | $16.07 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +3.8%/yr | −1.1%/yr |
| EPS | +26.5%/yr | +10.9%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +1.4%/yr | +0.7%/yr |
| Book value / share | +10.2%/yr | +1.3%/yr |
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- Before capital spendingCash from operations $7M · capital spending not separately filed
What this means
Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.
- Thin against what the buildings costCash from operations $7M ÷ real estate at cost $1.3B
What this means
The cash the properties throw off, measured against what they cost to acquire and build rather than against a market value nobody filed. Read it across the record: a portfolio whose yield on cost is rising is either raising rents faster than it is adding buildings, or buying well. Gross cost is used deliberately, so accumulated depreciation cannot shrink the denominator and flatter the return.
- Not covered by operating cashDividends $20M ÷ cash from operations $7M
What this means
A REIT must distribute most of its taxable income, so a high payout is normal and the question is whether the cash covers it. This is a harder test than the industry's usual one: funds from operations adds depreciation back without deducting the capital that genuinely keeps buildings competitive, so a distribution can look covered on that measure and still be funded by borrowing or by selling buildings. Above 100% of operating cash, it is being funded by something other than the properties.
- Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
What this means
Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.
Is it sound?
- Debt / assets 38%ConservativeTotal debt $474M ÷ assets $1.2BIndustry peers: median 39%
What this means
Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.
- Adequate(operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $20MIndustry peers: median 2.0×
What this means
How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. The bill counted here is every dollar of interest the trust incurred, including the part it charged into the cost of buildings under construction rather than against this year's earnings — that money is paid to lenders all the same, and leaving it out flatters exactly the trusts doing the most building. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.
- Consolidated accounts only
What this means
These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.
- Insider ownership6.1%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
Peers
Gladstone Land Corp is listed here as a claim on a business rather than as the business itself — a preferred series, a bond or a warrant, filed under the same registrant as the common stock. A comparative table lines businesses up against one another, so there is none here. The business behind it is Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND), where the record, the scorecard and the peer bench are.
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFA reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).
Manual order: ← LAND its page in the Manual LANDP →
Industry order: ← LAND the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter LANDP →