← All companies ← BRSL Manual BSBR → ← BPOPM Banks BSBR →
BSAC, Banco Santander - Chile ADS
A balance-sheet business, read on book value, net interest margin and credit losses rather than an earnings multiple.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on equity has run high across the record (median 16%, above 12% in 6 of 10 years). A bank that earns above its cost of equity through the cycle compounds book value; whether this one did it by underwriting discipline or by reaching for risk is what the 10-K, and the worst years in the record, will tell you.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- Return on equity 18%Very high (≥17%)Net income CLP 1.02T ÷ equity CLP 5.62TIndustry peers: median 12%
What this means
The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.
- Very high (≥18%)Net income ÷ (equity − goodwill CLP 0 − intangibles CLP 91.5B)Industry peers: median 14%
What this means
The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median 60%
What this means
Noninterest expense or revenue missing.
Is it sound?
- Capital (equity / assets) 8.2%AdequateEquity CLP 5.62T ÷ assets CLP 68.15T
What this means
A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.
- Deposit funding 21%Leans on wholesale fundingDeposits CLP 14.08T ÷ assets CLP 68.15T
What this means
Low-cost, sticky deposits are a bank's real moat, the cheap raw material it lends out at a spread. A bank funded mostly by deposits earns more durably than one that rents its money in the wholesale market.
- Credit cost —Not enough data
What this means
Provision or net interest income missing.
The franchise and the credit cycle
- Not enough data
What this means
The deposit mix isn't cleanly tagged in the filings' structured data; the funding read above carries what is.
- Not enough data
What this means
Not derivable from the filings' structured data — some filers carry recoveries only on segment axes, and a gross figure dressed as net would be a wrong number.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Peers, Banks
The same industry, side by side on the bank lens. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | ROEmedian over the record | ROTCEmedian over the record | Efficiencymedian over the record | NII / assetsmedian over the record | Noninterest-bearing sharelatest FY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAPCredicorp Ltd. | $5.4B | 16% | 18% | 23% | 4.8% | — |
| GGALGrupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | $4.3B | 26% | 27% | 27% | 12.2% | — |
| FHNFirst Horizon | $3.4B | 10% | 14% | 63% | 2.9% | 23% |
| BSACBanco Santander - Chile ADS | $3.4B | 16% | 17% | — | 2.8% | — |
| ZIONZions Bancorporation N.A. | $3.4B | 12% | 14% | 62% | 2.9% | 34% |
| BPOPPopular Inc. | $3.2B | 11% | 13% | 61% | 3.3% | 23% |
| WBSWebster Financial | $2.9B | 10% | 14% | 59% | 3.0% | 15% |
| BBARBanco BBVA Argentina S.A. ADS | $2.3B | 16% | 16% | 24%1y | 21.8% | — |
| Group median | — | 14% | 15% | — | 3.1% | — |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
price / tangible bookEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American Depositary Shares (“ADS”), each representing the right to receive 400 Shares of Common”; Banco Santander - Chile ADS reports in CLP, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at CLP 1 = $0.001 (2026-08-20, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in CLP.
A bank is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what Banco Santander - Chile ADS’s record justifies.
Tangible book / share, delivered9%/yr’20→’25
The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A bank earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a bank.
Enter a price above to run it.
Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Tangible book $6.0B on 471M shares, a 17% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the bank keeps earning that return; a credit cycle, a rate shock or a bad acquisition changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.
Manual order: ← BRSL its page in the Manual BSBR →
Industry order: ← BPOPM the Banks chapter BSBR →