Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← ESQ Manual ESS → ← DEI REITs — Office HIW →

ESRT, Empire State Realty Trust Inc.

A property business, read on funds from operations and net asset value rather than reported earnings.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
ESRT · Empire State Realty Trust Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$768M
+0.0% YoY · 5% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $784M 5-yr avg $725M
Cash margin 29% 5-yr avg 32%
Dividend / operating cash 11% 5-yr avg 10%

Next report By 11/8 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~37 days after · the wire records it on arrival

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Operating cash per share has been roughly flat (2% a year). The dividend takes 11% of FFO, and is covered. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMJun 2026
Income statement
$677M$710M$732M$731M$609M$624M$727M$740M$768M$768M$784MRevenueRevenue
$51M$63M$66M$49M($17M)($11M)$36M$49M$47M$43M$3MNet incomeNet inc.
Cash flow & returns
$155M$161M$169M$182M$191M$202M$217M$190M$185M$195M$199MDepreciation & amortizationD&A
$215M$194M$279M$233M$182M$212M$211M$232M$261M$249M$228MCash from operationsOp. cash
$56M$67M$71M$75M$37M$18M$23M$23M$23M$24M$24MDividends paidDiv. paid
Balance sheet
26%34%25%32%20%9%11%10%9%10%11%Dividend / operating cashPayout
Cash flow & returns
($182M)($223M)($643M)$150M($143M)($213M)($231M)($77M)($397M)($550M)Investing cash flowInv. cash
$471M($57M)$105M($382M)$257M($93M)($140M)($63M)$159M$38MFinancing cash flowFin. cash
$503M($86M)($259M)$784K$296M($93M)($160M)$92M$22M($263M)Change in cashΔ cash
Balance sheet
$2.5B$2.7B$2.9B$3.1B$3.1B$3.5B$3.6B$3.7B$3.8B$4.2B$4.5BReal estate (gross)RE gross
$3.9B$3.9B$4.2B$3.9B$4.2B$4.3B$4.2B$4.2B$4.5B$4.5B$4.3BTotal assetsAssets
20%18%19%22%21%21%Debt / assetsDebt/assets
$759M$717M$609M$606M$776M$949M$884M$877M$692M$619M$443MTotal debtDebt
$205M$253M$4M$372M$249M$525M$619M$531M$307M$487M$357MNet debt / (cash)Net debt
$71M$68M$80M$79M$90M$94M$101M$101M$105M$103M$107MInterest expenseInt. exp.
2.6×2.8×2.4×2.0×0.7×0.8×1.3×1.4×1.5×1.3×-0.3×Interest coverageInt. cov.
$1.9B$2.0B$2.2B$2.0B$2.4B$2.6B$2.5B$2.5B$2.7B$2.6BTotal liabilitiesTotal liab.
$821M$801M$745M$690MNoncontrolling interestsNCI
$1.2B$1.2B$1.2B$1.2B$1.1B$998M$954M$986M$1.0B$1.1B$1.0BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
278M298M297M298M284M277M270M266M269M270M269MShares out (diluted)Shares
$0.20$0.22$0.24$0.25$0.13$0.07$0.09$0.09$0.09$0.09$0.09Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$4.16$3.92$4.17$4.13$3.72$3.60$3.54$3.71$3.83$3.93$3.86Book value / shareBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+1.7%/yr+5.8%/yr
Owner earnings / share+13.2%/yr−7.4%/yr
EPS−1.6%/yr
Dividends / share−8.8%/yr−7.7%/yr
Capital spending / share+0.4%/yr+14.9%/yr
Book value / share−0.6%/yr+1.1%/yr
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • A range, because the filings do not split maintenance from expansion
    Between cash from operations less all capital spending $249M − $198M = $51M, and cash from operations $249M
    What this means

    Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.

  • Ordinary for property
    Cash from operations $249M ÷ real estate at cost $4.2B
    What this means

    The cash the properties throw off, measured against what they cost to acquire and build rather than against a market value nobody filed. Read it across the record: a portfolio whose yield on cost is rising is either raising rents faster than it is adding buildings, or buying well. Gross cost is used deliberately, so accumulated depreciation cannot shrink the denominator and flatter the return.

  • Lightly covered
    Dividends $24M ÷ cash from operations $249M
    Occupancy at fiscal year end, in the filing’s words
    Occupancy, as filed — the scope is the sentence’s own words70.6%
    “As of December 31, 2025, the percent occupied and percent leased were 70.6%, which was comprised of 68.3% for office space and 100% for retail space.”
    Occupancy, as filed — the scope is the sentence’s own words49.5%
    “As of December 31, 2025, the percent occupied and percent leased were 0% and 49.5%, respectively.”
    ✓ each figure is its sentence’s own characters, dated to the fiscal year end inside the sentence
    What this means

    A REIT must distribute most of its taxable income, so a high payout is normal and the question is whether the cash covers it. This is a harder test than the industry's usual one: funds from operations adds depreciation back without deducting the capital that genuinely keeps buildings competitive, so a distribution can look covered on that measure and still be funded by borrowing or by selling buildings. Above 100% of operating cash, it is being funded by something other than the properties.

  • Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
    What this means

    Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.

Is it sound?

  • Not cleanly captured
    Industry peers: median 37%
    What this means

    This REIT tags its borrowings in a way the pipeline could not fully total, so we decline to show a leverage figure rather than a misleadingly low one. The debt schedule in the 10-K is where to read its true leverage.

  • Comfortable
    (operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $104M (including $464K charged into development)
    Industry peers: median 4.5×
    What this means

    How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. The bill counted here is every dollar of interest the trust incurred, including the part it charged into the cost of buildings under construction rather than against this year's earnings — that money is paid to lenders all the same, and leaving it out flatters exactly the trusts doing the most building. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.

  • Consolidated accounts only
    What this means

    These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021Mr. Malkin$7.9M$1.3M($186M)
2022Mr. Malkin$8.4M$6.5M$125M
2023Mr. Malkin$9.0M$20.8M$63M
2024Mr. Malkin$13.2M$17.6M$88M
2025Mr. Malkin$12.7M$2.7M$51M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.

  • Insider ownership0.1%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • CEO pay ratio170:1

    What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.

  • Stock-based compensation$25M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 3.3% of revenue, equal to 18.6% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Peers, Office REITs

The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each column names the period it is read over; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.

CompanyRevenuelatest FY, USDCash marginmedian over the recordCash / assetsmedian over the recordDividend / cashmedian over the recordDebt / assetsmedian over the record
KRCKilroy Realty$1.1B52%5.1%46%39%
DEIDouglas Emmett$1.0B48%4.7%38%53%
SLGSL Green Realty$1.0B30%2.7%88%27%
CUZCousins Properties$994M46%4.8%48%31%
HIWHighwoods Properties$806M49%6.9%54%
ESRTEmpire State Realty Trust Inc.$768M32%5.5%16%20%
CDPCopt Defense Properties$764M39%6.2%47%52%
JBGSJBG SMITH Properties$499M29%3.0%56%35%
Group median43%5.0%47%35%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

reverse-DCF

A reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Empire State Realty Trust Inc. (ESRT), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/ESRT, data as of 2026-08-17.

Manual order: ← ESQ its page in the Manual ESS →

Industry order: ← DEI the REITs — Office chapter HIW →