Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← RNR Manual ROAD → ← RF Banks RRBI →

RNST, Renasant Corporation

Banks financial

A balance-sheet business, read on book value, net interest margin and credit losses rather than an earnings multiple.

Upon completion of the merger, Southwest Georgia Insurance Services, Inc., a Georgia corporation, became a subsidiary of Renasant Bank and engaged in the insurance agency business until Renasant Bank's sale of substantially all of its assets on December 31, 2025.

No longer has an Insurance segment as a result of the sale of the Company's insurance agency businesses in July 2024 and December 2025 as discussed above.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
RNST · Renasant Corporation
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$986M
+37.7% YoY · 8% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · FY2025, with 5-yr average
Revenue $986M 5-yr avg $723M
Return on equity 5% 5-yr avg 7%
Return on tangible equity 8% 5-yr avg 12%
Efficiency ratio 66% 5-yr avg 66%
Equity / assets 14.5% 5-yr avg 13.7%

Next report By 11/8 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~37 days after · the wire records it on arrival

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on concentrated dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on equity has sat below the cost of equity (median 7%, above 12% in only 0 of 10 years). It runs at a 66% efficiency ratio, about average. The cycle and the loan book decide this one; weigh the recession years in the record, not the average, and read the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25
Income statement
$438M$469M$540M$597M$662M$651M$631M$632M$716M$986MRevenueRevenue
$329M$375M$462M$543M$498M$469M$542M$797M$888M$1.3BInterest incomeInt. inc.
$28M$38M$65M$99M$71M$45M$61M$278M$376M$458MInterest expenseInt. exp.
$301M$337M$397M$444M$427M$424M$481M$519M$512M$804MNet interest incomeNet int.
$137M$132M$144M$153M$236M$227M$149M$113M$204M$182MNoninterest incomeFee inc.
$7M$8M$7M$7M$87M($2M)$24M$16M$9M$107MCredit-loss provisionProvision
$136M$160M$189M$216M$103M$223M$211M$177M$245M$227MPretax incomePretax
$91M$92M$147M$168M$84M$176M$166M$145M$195M$181MNet incomeNet inc.
33%42%22%22%19%21%21%18%20%20%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
1.0%0.9%1.1%1.3%0.6%1.0%1.0%0.8%1.1%0.7%Return on assetsROA
7%6%7%8%4%8%8%6%7%5%Return on equityROE
5%4%5%5%2%6%5%4%5%3%Retained to equityRetained/eq
12%10%14%15%7%14%15%11%12%8%Return on tangible equityROTCE
67%64%64%63%71%66%63%70%64%66%Efficiency ratioEffic.
$30M$34M$44M$51M$50M$50M$50M$50M$54M$79MDividends paidDiv. paid
$0$0$7M$63M$25M$21M$0$0$0$13MBuybacksBuybacks
($352M)$70M($503M)($506M)($1.3B)($660M)($2.0B)($55M)($275M)($734M)Investing cash flowInv. cash
$283M($301M)$709M$188M$1.4B$1.8B$168M$132M$459M$441MFinancing cash flowFin. cash
$95M($25M)$288M($154M)$218M$1.2B($1.3B)$225M$291M($21M)Change in cashΔ cash
Balance sheet
$6.2B$7.6B$9.1B$9.7B$10.9B$10.0B$11.6B$12.4B$12.9B$19.0BLoans held for investmentLoans
$43M$46M$49M$52M$176M$164M$192M$199M$202M$294MCredit-loss allowanceAllowance
$8.7B$9.8B$12.9B$13.4B$14.9B$16.8B$17.0B$17.4B$18.0B$26.8BTotal assetsAssets
$7.1B$7.9B$10.1B$10.2B$12.1B$13.9B$13.5B$14.1B$14.6B$21.5BDepositsDeposits
$471M$611M$933M$940M$940M$940M$992M$992M$989M$1.4BGoodwillGoodwill
$7.5B$8.3B$10.9B$11.3B$12.8B$14.6B$14.9B$15.1B$15.4B$22.9BTotal liabilitiesTotal liab.
$1.2B$1.5B$2.0B$2.1B$2.1B$2.2B$2.1B$2.3B$2.7B$3.9BShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
42.0M47.0M52.6M58.2M56.5M56.4M56.2M56.4M59.7M87.5MShares out (diluted)Shares
$2.17$1.96$2.79$2.88$1.48$3.12$2.95$2.56$3.27$2.07EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.71$0.73$0.83$0.87$0.89$0.89$0.89$0.89$0.90$0.90Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$29.36$32.23$38.84$36.51$37.77$39.16$38.00$40.70$44.83$44.39Book value / shareBVPS
$17.58$18.71$20.26$19.73$20.59$22.08$19.93$22.80$28.04$26.65Tangible book / shareTBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×1.46 into 2025 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+0.8%/yr−0.8%/yr
Owner earnings / share−3.0%/yr+25.0%/yr
EPS−0.5%/yr+6.9%/yr
Dividends / share+2.7%/yr+0.2%/yr
Capital spending / share+2.0%/yr−5.1%/yr
Book value / share+4.7%/yr+3.3%/yr
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →
Material weakness in financial controls
“Management's report on internal controls over financial reporting and our plan for remediation of the identified material weakness is contained in Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, of this report.”

The figures below are only as sound as the controls that produced them. read the note →

Is it a good business?

  • Below the cost of equity
    Net income $181M ÷ equity $3.9B
    Industry peers: median 10%

    In the filing’s words The filing discloses a material weakness in its financial controls — the reported numbers here, and the record built on them, are only as reliable as the controls that produced them.

    What this means

    The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.

  • Modest
    Net income ÷ (equity − goodwill $1.4B − intangibles $147M)
    Industry peers: median 13%
    What this means

    The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.

  • Average
    Noninterest expense $652M ÷ (net interest income + fees)
    Industry peers: median 53%
    What this means

    The share of revenue eaten by running costs; lower is better, and below about 60% marks a genuinely efficient operation. A low ratio held for years is the operational side of a moat.

Is it sound?

  • Capital (equity / assets) 14.5%
    Well capitalized
    Equity $3.9B ÷ assets $26.8B
    What this means

    A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.

  • Deposit-funded
    Deposits $21.5B ÷ assets $26.8B
    What this means

    Low-cost, sticky deposits are a bank's real moat, the cheap raw material it lends out at a spread. A bank funded mostly by deposits earns more durably than one that rents its money in the wholesale market.

  • Credit cost (provision / NII) 13%
    Moderate
    Provision for credit losses $107M ÷ net interest income $804M
    What this means

    What the bank set aside this year against loans going bad, as a share of its lending income. This swings hard with the cycle, low in good years and spiking in recessions, so read it across the record, not in one year. Disciplined underwriting shows up as low, stable provisions through a downturn.

The franchise and the credit cycle

  • Solid core deposits
    Noninterest-bearing deposits $5.0B ÷ deposits $21.5B · pays 2.99% on the interest-bearing rest (avg of year-ends)
    What this means

    The share of deposits the bank pays nothing for — checking accounts that stay through rate cycles. This is the deposit moat in one number: a high share means cheap, sticky raw material for lending; a low share means the funding reprices with every rate move. Buffett's Wells letter is built on exactly this economics.

  • Disciplined book
    Charge-offs net of recoveries $25M ÷ loans $16.0B (avg of year-ends) · worst year on record 0.13% · allowance held at 1.54% of loans
    What this means

    Loans actually written off, net of what was later recovered — the realized truth the provisions were guessing at. Graham's rule applies doubly here: the worst year in the record, not the average, is the read, because a loan book's sins are committed in the good years and confessed in the bad ones.

  • Marks are small
    Pre-tax, as filed for FY2025: HTM at cost $1.0B − fair value $962M = $68M, against tangible common equity $2.3B · widest on record FY2024: $124M (45% accreted back since)
    What this means

    Bonds held to maturity are carried at cost, so rate rises open a gap that only shows in this disclosure. Stated equity already carries every available-for-sale mark through accumulated other comprehensive income; the held-to-maturity book's gap sits outside equity, which is why it is read here. The figure is pre-tax as the filer states it — the true after-tax dent depends on a deferred-tax position the record does not carry. The gap never hits earnings if the bank can hold on, which is precisely why the reader checks whether it could be forced to sell: the 2023 bank failures were this number meeting deposit flight. The record carries no stated uninsured figure for this filer; its franchise leg: noninterest-bearing deposits, 23% of the base.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021$3.2M$3.5M$122M
2021$3.2M$3.5M$122M
2022Mr. Waycaster$3.5M$3.0M$559M
2023Mr. Waycaster$2.8M$2.2M$127M
2024Mr. Waycaster$3.5M$3.6M$93M
2025Mr. Chapman$3.4M$3.2M$255M
2025Mr. Waycaster$2.2M$1.9M$255M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years. A dash under the name means the filing tags the figure without naming the officer.

  • Insider ownership2.1%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$18M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 1.8% of revenue, equal to 2.6% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

Peers, Banks

The same industry, side by side on the bank lens. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.

CompanyRevenuelatest FY, USDROEmedian over the recordROTCEmedian over the recordEfficiencymedian over the recordNII / assetsmedian over the recordNoninterest-bearing sharelatest FY
HOMBHome BancShares$1.1B11%17%42%3.7%22%
UCBUnited Community Banks Inc.$1.1B9%12%57%3.0%26%
GBCIGlacier Bancorp$1.0B10%13%59%3.1%
CBCCentral Bancompany Inc.$1.0B10%2y11%2y52%2y3.7%2y35%
RNSTRenasant Corporation$986M7%12%65%3.0%23%
FHBFirst Hawaiian$881M10%16%53%2.6%32%
INDBIndependent Bank Group$858M9%12%59%3.0%
IBOCInternational Bancshares Corporation$842M11%13%48%3.3%36%
Group median10%13%55%3.1%29%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / tangible book

A bank is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what Renasant Corporation’s record justifies.

$
The assumptions

Tangible book / share, delivered6%/yr’20→’25

The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A bank earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a bank.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / tangible book
Justified by the return
Normalized return on tangible equity12%
Price / book
Earnings yield
P/E (3-yr avg ’23–’25)
Graham’s price gate

Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.

Tangible book $2.3B on 91M shares, a 12% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the bank keeps earning that return; a credit cycle, a rate shock or a bad acquisition changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Renasant Corporation (RNST), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/RNST, data as of 2026-08-17.

Manual order: ← RNR its page in the Manual ROAD →

Industry order: ← RF the Banks chapter RRBI →