Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← TCBK Manual TCI → ← TCBK Banks TD →

TCBX, Third Coast Bancshares Inc.

Banks financial

We focus on providing commercial banking solutions to small and medium-sized businesses and professionals with operations in our markets.

Our market expertise, coupled with a deep understanding of our customers' needs, allows us to deliver tailored financial products and services.

Following the completion of our merger with Keystone discussed below, we currently operate twenty branches in the Greater Houston, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Austin-San Antonio markets, one branch in Ballinger, Texas, and one branch in Detroit, Texas.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
TCBX · Third Coast Bancshares Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$209M
+21.9% YoY · 24% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · FY2025, with 5-yr average
Revenue $209M 5-yr avg $149M
Return on equity 12% 5-yr avg 8%
Return on tangible equity 12% 5-yr avg 8%
Efficiency ratio 57% 5-yr avg 66%
Equity / assets 9.9% 5-yr avg 10.1%

Next report Est. 11/2–11/6 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~36 days after · the wire records it on arrival

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on equity has sat below the cost of equity (median 8%, above 12% in only 1 of 7 years). It runs at a 57% efficiency ratio, lean. The cycle and the loan book decide this one; weigh the recession years in the record, not the average, and read the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2019–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25
Income statement
$35M$71M$95M$124M$148M$171M$209MRevenueRevenue
$50M$82M$101M$154M$267M$328M$354MInterest incomeInt. inc.
$16M$14M$10M$37M$127M$168M$159MInterest expenseInt. exp.
$34M$68M$91M$116M$140M$161M$195MNet interest incomeNet int.
$1M$3M$5M$7M$8M$11M$14MNoninterest incomeFee inc.
$2M$8M$10M$12M$6M$6M$8MCredit-loss provisionProvision
$3M$16M$14M$23M$42M$61M$83MPretax incomePretax
$2M$12M$11M$19M$33M$48M$66MNet incomeNet inc.
26%22%21%19%20%22%20%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
0.6%0.5%0.5%0.8%1.0%1.2%Return on assetsROA
4%10%4%5%8%10%12%Return on equityROE
4%10%4%5%8%10%12%Retained to equityRetained/eq
4%12%4%5%8%10%12%Return on tangible equityROTCE
86%67%74%71%68%61%57%Efficiency ratioEffic.
($122M)($500M)($500M)($1.2B)($530M)($521M)($610M)Investing cash flowInv. cash
$79M$611M$619M$1.2B$570M$495M$319MFinancing cash flowFin. cash
($39M)$107M$123M$5M$80M$9M($240M)Change in cashΔ cash
Balance sheet
$1.6B$2.1B$3.1B$4.0B$4.4BLoans held for investmentLoans
$8M$12M$19M$30M$37M$40M$44MCredit-loss allowanceAllowance
$1.9B$2.5B$3.8B$4.4B$4.9B$5.3BTotal assetsAssets
$1.6B$2.1B$3.2B$3.8B$4.3B$4.6BDepositsDeposits
$18M$18M$18M$18MGoodwillGoodwill
$2.2B$3.4B$4.0B$4.5B$4.8BTotal liabilitiesTotal liab.
$57M$120M$299M$382M$412M$461M$531MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
3.9M6.3M8.1M13.8M16.9M17.1M17.5MShares out (diluted)Shares
$0.60$1.91$1.40$1.36$1.98$2.78$3.79EPS (diluted)EPS
$14.35$19.02$36.74$27.76$24.41$26.89$30.38Book value / shareBVPS
$14.35$15.94$34.36$26.36$23.28$26.89$30.38Tangible book / shareTBVPS

The diluted share count moved ×1.61 into 2020 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

The diluted share count moved ×1.69 into 2022 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.

Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
6-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+5.0%/yr+1.4%/yr
Owner earnings / share+23.1%/yr (5-yr)+23.1%/yr
EPS+35.8%/yr+14.7%/yr
Capital spending / share−32.9%/yr (5-yr)−32.9%/yr
Book value / share+13.3%/yr+9.8%/yr
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • Adequate
    Net income $66M ÷ equity $531M
    Industry peers: median 10%
    What this means

    The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.

  • Solid
    Net income ÷ (equity − goodwill $0 − intangibles $0)
    Industry peers: median 11%
    What this means

    The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.

  • Low cost ratio (<58%)
    Noninterest expense $119M ÷ (net interest income + fees)
    Industry peers: median 63%
    What this means

    The share of revenue eaten by running costs; lower is better, and below about 60% marks a genuinely efficient operation. A low ratio held for years is the operational side of a moat.

Is it sound?

  • Capital (equity / assets) 9.9%
    Adequate
    Equity $531M ÷ assets $5.3B
    What this means

    A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.

  • Deposit-funded
    Deposits $4.6B ÷ assets $5.3B
    What this means

    Low-cost, sticky deposits are a bank's real moat, the cheap raw material it lends out at a spread. A bank funded mostly by deposits earns more durably than one that rents its money in the wholesale market.

  • Credit cost (provision / NII) 4%
    Low
    Provision for credit losses $8M ÷ net interest income $195M
    What this means

    What the bank set aside this year against loans going bad, as a share of its lending income. This swings hard with the cycle, low in good years and spiking in recessions, so read it across the record, not in one year. Disciplined underwriting shows up as low, stable provisions through a downturn.

The franchise and the credit cycle

  • Rate-sensitive funding
    Noninterest-bearing deposits $495M ÷ deposits $4.6B · pays 3.83% on the interest-bearing rest (avg of year-ends)
    What this means

    The share of deposits the bank pays nothing for — checking accounts that stay through rate cycles. This is the deposit moat in one number: a high share means cheap, sticky raw material for lending; a low share means the funding reprices with every rate move. Buffett's Wells letter is built on exactly this economics.

  • Disciplined book
    Charge-offs net of recoveries $4M ÷ loans $4.2B (avg of year-ends) · worst year on record 0.13% · allowance held at 1.00% of loans
    What this means

    Loans actually written off, net of what was later recovered — the realized truth the provisions were guessing at. Graham's rule applies doubly here: the worst year in the record, not the average, is the read, because a loan book's sins are committed in the good years and confessed in the bad ones.

  • Marks are small
    Pre-tax, as filed for FY2025: HTM at cost $192M − fair value $189M = $3M, against stated equity $531M
    What this means

    Bonds held to maturity are carried at cost, so rate rises open a gap that only shows in this disclosure. Stated equity already carries every available-for-sale mark through accumulated other comprehensive income; the held-to-maturity book's gap sits outside equity, which is why it is read here. The figure is pre-tax as the filer states it — the true after-tax dent depends on a deferred-tax position the record does not carry. The gap never hits earnings if the bank can hold on, which is precisely why the reader checks whether it could be forced to sell: the 2023 bank failures were this number meeting deposit flight. The record carries no stated uninsured figure for this filer; its franchise leg: noninterest-bearing deposits, 11% of the base.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid.

  • Insider ownership10.5%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$2M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 0.8% of revenue, equal to 0.7% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • Which reported numbers are a judgment call?
    Management names Credit & receivables as critical estimates

    each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Banks

The same industry, side by side on the bank lens. Each column names the period it is read over; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.

CompanyRevenuelatest FY, USDROEmedian over the recordROTCEmedian over the recordEfficiencymedian over the recordNII / assetsmedian over the recordNoninterest-bearing sharelatest FY
HFWAHeritage Financial Corporation$246M8%11%64%3.2%27%
NBBKNB Bancorp Inc.$214M6%6%63%2.9%
HTBHomeTrust Bancshares Inc.$213M6%7%71%3.1%19%
TCBXThird Coast Bancshares Inc.$209M8%8%68%3.4%11%
SMBCSouthern Missouri Bancorp Inc.$183M11%12%57%3.2%12%
FSBWFS Bancorp Inc.$153M13%13%66%4.1%25%
HBCPHome Bancorp Inc.$149M10%12%61%3.6%27%
NECBNorthEast Community Bancorp Inc.$105M11%11%44%4.7%17%
Group median9%11%64%3.3%19%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / tangible book

A bank is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what Third Coast Bancshares Inc.’s record justifies.

$
The assumptions

Tangible book / share, delivered7%/yr’20→’25

The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A bank earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a bank.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / tangible book
Justified by the return
Normalized return on tangible equity8%
Price / book
Earnings yield
P/E (3-yr avg ’23–’25)
Graham’s price gate

Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.

Tangible book $531M on 17M shares, a 8% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the bank keeps earning that return; a credit cycle, a rate shock or a bad acquisition changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Third Coast Bancshares Inc. (TCBX), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/TCBX, data as of 2026-08-17.

Manual order: ← TCBK its page in the Manual TCI →

Industry order: ← TCBK the Banks chapter TD →