← All companies ← CHA Manual CHT → ← CGNT Software CLBT →
CHKP, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Our solutions deliver leading protection across infrastructure, to make sure organizations are protected from AI-driven attacks.
The Check Point Mission Securing Our Customers' AI Transformation We are constantly doing the hard work of getting our solutions ready to enable a secure AI transformation.
We continually modify and improve our security platform services by: Regularly updating our security solutions to defend against the full spectrum of evolving threats.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is led by Security Subscriptions (45%) and Software updates and maintenance (35%), with 2 more lines behind.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 88% and operating margin about 43% through the cycle, a wide spread between price and the cost of what it sells — whether that advantage is durable pricing power or a margin that can erode is the question the record is for. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run high across the record (median 25%, above 15% in 10 of 10 years), though buybacks and expensed R&D and brands shrink the capital base, so the figure overstates the underlying economics. The steadier read is owner earnings: roughly 54% of revenue reaches owners as cash, consistently. Whether these returns reflect real pricing power or an accounting artifact is the judgment the 10-K is for.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 20-F →Revenue spreads across 4 lines, the largest Security Subscriptions at 45%.
- Security Subscriptions45%$1.2B
- Software updates and maintenance35%$958M
- Network Security Gateways19%$506M
- Other2%$42M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 20-F. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMDec 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $1.7B | $1.9B | $1.9B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $2.4B | $2.6B | $2.7B | $2.7B | RevenueRevenue |
| $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.2B | $2.4B | $2.4B | Gross profitGross prof. |
| 88% | 89% | 89% | 89% | 89% | 88% | 87% | 88% | 88% | 87% | 87% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| $852M | $924M | $914M | $882M | $904M | $908M | $884M | $899M | $876M | $831M | $831M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 48.9% | 49.8% | 47.7% | 44.2% | 43.8% | 41.9% | 38.0% | 37.2% | 34.2% | 30.5% | 30.5% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $725M | $803M | $821M | $826M | $847M | $816M | $797M | $840M | $846M | $1.1B | $840M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 19% | 17% | 16% | 14% | 13% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 13% | — | — | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $949M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.2B | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $11M | $13M | $16M | $17M | $19M | $21M | $23M | $23M | $24M | $25M | $25M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $214M | $294M | $306M | $262M | $296M | $368M | $279M | $175M | $183M | $118M | $334M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $24M | $29M | $17M | $26M | $19M | $16M | $22M | $19M | $24M | $27M | $27M | CapexCapex |
| 1.4% | 1.6% | 0.9% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.0% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| $938M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.2B | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| 53.9% | 59.1% | 58.8% | 54.5% | 55.3% | 54.8% | 46.2% | 42.2% | 40.1% | 43.0% | 43.0% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| $925M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.2B | Free cash flowFCF |
| 53.1% | 58.3% | 58.8% | 54.1% | 55.3% | 54.8% | 46.2% | 42.2% | 40.1% | 43.0% | 43.0% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $988M | $995M | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.4B | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| 21% | 23% | 22% | 23% | 25% | 26% | 28% | 34% | 33% | 77% | 77% | ROICROIC |
| 21% | 22% | 22% | 23% | 24% | 25% | 27% | 30% | 30% | 37% | 29% | Return on equityROE |
| 21% | 22% | 22% | 23% | 24% | 25% | 27% | 30% | 30% | 37% | 29% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $187M | $245M | $304M | $279M | $256M | $272M | $196M | $538M | $506M | $1.8B | $2.5B | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| $479M | $472M | $495M | $496M | $541M | $598M | $644M | $658M | $729M | $769M | $769M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $20M | $12M | $21M | $16M | $18M | $10M | $30M | $48M | $55M | $28M | $28M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $458M | $460M | $475M | $480M | $523M | $588M | $615M | $609M | $674M | $742M | $742M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $1.9B | $2.0B | $2.3B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $2.3B | $2.2B | $4.0B | $4.0B | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $1.9B | $1.9B | $1.9B | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 1.6× | 1.6× | 1.7× | 1.5× | 1.5× | 1.4× | 1.3× | 1.2× | 1.1× | 2.0× | 2.0× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $62M | $78M | $79M | $88M | $88M | $83M | $83M | $80M | $81M | $83M | $83M | Net PP&ENet PP&E |
| $812M | $812M | $951M | $982M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $1.9B | GoodwillGoodwill |
| $5.2B | $5.5B | $5.8B | $5.8B | $5.8B | $5.9B | $5.7B | $5.7B | $5.8B | $7.8B | $7.8B | Total assetsAssets |
| ($187M) | ($245M) | ($304M) | ($279M) | ($256M) | ($272M) | ($196M) | ($538M) | ($506M) | ($1.8B) | ($2.5B) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $3.5B | $3.6B | $3.8B | $3.6B | $3.5B | $3.3B | $2.9B | $2.8B | $2.8B | $2.9B | $2.9B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 173M | 167M | 159M | 152M | 142M | 134M | 126M | 118M | 113M | 110M | 106M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $10.05 | $11.13 | $12.02 | $13.12 | $14.54 | $16.16 | $18.44 | $20.40 | $22.62 | $24.80 | $25.81 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $4.18 | $4.82 | $5.15 | $5.43 | $5.96 | $6.08 | $6.31 | $7.10 | $7.46 | $9.62 | $7.96 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $5.41 | $6.58 | $7.07 | $7.15 | $8.04 | $8.86 | $8.52 | $8.61 | $9.07 | $10.67 | $11.11 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $5.34 | $6.49 | $7.07 | $7.09 | $8.04 | $8.86 | $8.52 | $8.61 | $9.07 | $10.67 | $11.11 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.14 | $0.17 | $0.11 | $0.17 | $0.14 | $0.12 | $0.17 | $0.16 | $0.21 | $0.24 | $0.25 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $20.15 | $21.61 | $23.67 | $23.46 | $24.41 | $24.29 | $23.19 | $23.84 | $24.60 | $26.22 | $27.29 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +10.6%/yr | +11.3%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +7.8%/yr | +5.8%/yr |
| EPS | +9.7%/yr | +10.0%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +6.4%/yr | +12.2%/yr |
| Book value / share | +3.0%/yr | +1.4%/yr |
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned $1.1B of profit into $1.2B of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $1.1B | $846M | $840M | $797M | $816M |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$25M | +$24M | +$23M | +$23M | +$21M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | +$118M | +$183M | +$175M | +$279M | +$368M |
| Cash from operations | $1.2B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$27M | −$24M | −$19M | −$22M | −$16M |
| Owner earnings | $1.2B | $1.0B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 43% | 40% | 42% | 46% | 55% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- No meaningful interest burdenLittle or no interest expense reported
What this means
Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.
- Net cash, debt-freeCash $1.8B + ST investments $695M − debt $0
What this means
Cash and short-term investments exceed every dollar of debt by $2.5B, on net the company owes nothing, and can act from strength when others can't. Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 103 + DIO 0 − DPO 28 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash. (Little or no inventory, a services / asset-light model, so the inventory leg is ~0.)
Is it a good business?
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median -1%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- High through the cycle10-yr median margin, range 40%–59%; latest $1.2B = operating cash $1.2B − maintenance capex $27MIndustry peers: median 19%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 43% of revenue this year, a 54% median across 10 years.
- Cash-backedCash from ops $1.2B ÷ net income $840M
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Returned more than it generatedDividends + buybacks $1.4B ÷ Owner Earnings $1.2B — this fiscal year
What this means
The company returned more than it generated: against $1.2B of Owner Earnings, $1.4B (119%) went back to shareholders, $0 dividends, $1.4B buybacks — the excess came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not the year's operations. Sustained, that pattern draws down cash or adds debt; the net-debt line above shows where it stands. This year's proportion is 119%; across the record (2016–2025) it is 113%, the capital-allocation section below.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.07×MaintainingCapex $27M ÷ depreciation $25M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $2.7B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity PassCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 2.05×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record —Uninterrupted dividends · no dividend line tagged in the data
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. This record carries no dividends-paid line in any year — common for partnerships, whose distributions file under tags the chain doesn't read — so the criterion is withheld rather than judged on silence.
- Earnings growth NearEarnings +33% over the record · +17%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $8.66/share (latest year $7.96), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $27.29/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Operating margin 49% → 34% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 49% early to 34% lately, median 42% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Owner earnings growth +1%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 1% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2025 · 30.5% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −4.9%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Dec 31, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$2.5B
- Receivables$769M
- Other current assets$699M
- Accounts payable$28M
- Other current liabilities$1.9B
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2016–2025
Over the record, the business generated $11.1B of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash returner, paying most of what it earns straight back to owners.
- Reinvested$223M · 2%
- Buybacks$12.2B · 111%
- Returned to owners$12.2B
113% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $0 as dividends and $12.2B as buybacks.
- Source of funding−$1.4B
Reinvestment and shareholder returns ran $1.4B beyond the operating cash the business generated, so the gap was financed off the balance sheet.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $12.2B over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count−39.1%
The diluted count fell from 173M to 106M, so the buybacks outran the stock issued to staff.
- Dividend record—
No dividend line was reported in the filing data over the span; the record here neither confirms nor rules out a payout.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 10-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend summed across the company's full tagged history, write-downs across the 10-year record, from the company's own filings.
Peers, Software
The same industry, side by side on owner economics and what the growth costs. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Gross marginmedian over the record | Op. marginmedian over the record | ROICmedian over the record | Owner earn. marginmedian over the record | Sales & marketinglatest FY | Stock paylatest FY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NICENICE Ltd | $2.9B | 67% | 14.9% | 8% | 23% | — | — |
| OKTAOkta Inc. | $2.9B | 72% | -30.8% | -8% | 7% | 34.9% | 18.6% |
| PTCPTC Inc. | $2.7B | 79% | 21.1% | 10% | 19% | 20.7% | 7.9% |
| CHKPCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd. | $2.7B | 88% | 42.8% | 25% | 54% | — | — |
| ANSSAnsys Inc. | $2.5B | 87% | 31.7% | 13% | 30% | — | 10.6% |
| NTNXNutanix | $2.5B | 79% | -26.6% | -190%3y | -1% | 41.6% | 13.9% |
| DBXDropbox | $2.5B | 79% | 1.5% | -1% | 29% | 14.7% | 11.9% |
| MDBMongoDB Inc. | $2.5B | 73% | -34.1% | -19% | -5% | 38.3% | 22.3% |
| Group median | — | 79% | 8.2% | 3% | 21% | — | — |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.
Type today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. has delivered.
Through the cycle, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. earns about $1.5B on its 54.2% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 43.0% margin runs below that; the reported figure may understate a lean year. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.71% 10-year Treasury (Aug 18, 2026) + 4.29 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.71%, as of Aug 18, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $1.2B on 106M shares outstanding, per the 20-F cover, as of 2025-12-31; net cash $2.5B. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← CHA its page in the Manual CHT →
Industry order: ← CGNT the Software chapter CLBT →