Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← CPB Manual CPHI → ← COSO Banks CTBI →

CPF, Central Pacific Financial Corp New

Banks financial

A balance-sheet business, read on book value, net interest margin and credit losses rather than an earnings multiple.

Latest annual: FY2025 10-K
CPF · Central Pacific Financial Corp New
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2025
$293M
+16.9% YoY · 4% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · TTM, with 5-yr average
Revenue $301M 5-yr avg $263M
Return on equity 14% 5-yr avg 13%
Return on tangible equity 14% 5-yr avg 13%
Efficiency ratio 61% 5-yr avg 64%
Equity / assets 7.9% 5-yr avg 7.1%

Next report By 11/8 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~30 days after · the wire records it on arrival

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on equity has hovered around the cost of equity (median 11%, above 12% in 4 of 10 years). It runs at a 61% efficiency ratio, about average. The cycle and the loan book decide this one; weigh the recession years in the record, not the average, and read the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

The record, 2016–2025

realized figures from each filing · older years to the left
2016’162017’172018’182019’192020’202021’212022’222023’232024’242025’25TTMTTMJun 2026
Income statement
$200M$204M$212M$226M$243M$254M$263M$257M$250M$293M$301MRevenueRevenue
$167M$183M$198M$216M$212M$219M$233M$283M$306M$314MInterest incomeInt. inc.
$9M$15M$25M$32M$15M$8M$17M$73M$94M$73MInterest expenseInt. exp.
$158M$168M$173M$184M$198M$211M$216M$210M$212M$241M$248MNet interest incomeNet int.
$42M$36M$39M$42M$45M$43M$48M$47M$39M$52M$54MNoninterest incomeFee inc.
($6M)$6M$42M($15M)($1M)$15M$11M$13M$11MCredit-loss provisionProvision
$73M$76M$78M$78M$49M$106M$99M$77M$68M$98MPretax incomePretax
$47M$41M$59M$58M$37M$80M$74M$59M$53M$77M$83MNet incomeNet inc.
36%46%24%25%24%24%25%24%21%21%21%Effective tax rateTax rate
Cash flow & returns
0.9%0.7%1.0%1.0%0.6%1.1%1.0%0.8%0.7%1.0%1.1%Return on assetsROA
9%8%12%11%7%14%16%12%10%13%14%Return on equityROE
6%4%7%6%2%9%10%6%5%8%9%Retained to equityRetained/eq
10%9%12%11%7%15%17%12%10%13%14%Return on tangible equityROTCE
66%64%64%63%62%64%63%64%69%61%61%Efficiency ratioEffic.
$19M$21M$24M$26M$26M$27M$29M$28M$28M$29M$30MDividends paidDiv. paid
($277M)($296M)($211M)($129M)($597M)($662M)($384M)$180M$654K$67MInvesting cash flowInv. cash
$205M$197M$128M$58M$521M$777M$53M$126M($233M)($167M)Financing cash flowFin. cash
($2M)$20M$786K$1M$225M($217M)$410M($141M)($2M)Change in cashΔ cash
Balance sheet
$3.5B$3.8B$4.1B$4.4B$5.0B$5.1B$5.6B$5.4B$5.3B$5.3BLoans held for investmentLoans
$57M$50M$48M$48M$83M$68M$64M$64M$59M$60MCredit-loss allowanceAllowance
$5.4B$5.6B$5.8B$6.0B$6.6B$7.4B$7.4B$7.6B$7.5B$7.4B$7.5BTotal assetsAssets
$4.6B$5.0B$4.9B$5.1B$5.8B$6.6B$6.7B$6.8B$6.6B$6.6B$6.7BDepositsDeposits
$4.9B$5.1B$5.3B$5.5B$6.0B$6.9B$7.0B$7.1B$6.9B$6.8BTotal liabilitiesTotal liab.
$25K$24K$0$0$48K$48KNoncontrolling interestsNCI
$505M$500M$492M$529M$547M$558M$453M$504M$538M$593M$596MShareholders’ equityEquity
Per share
31.2M30.6M29.6M28.7M28.2M28.3M27.6M27.1M27.2M27.0M26.3MShares out (diluted)Shares
$1.50$1.34$2.01$2.03$1.32$2.83$2.68$2.17$1.97$2.86$3.16EPS (diluted)EPS
$0.60$0.70$0.82$0.90$0.92$0.95$1.03$1.04$1.04$1.09$1.14Dividends / shareDiv/sh
$16.16$16.32$16.61$18.43$19.40$19.76$16.43$18.60$19.82$21.91$22.71Book value / shareBVPS
$15.51$15.74$16.08$17.92$18.98$19.41$16.10$18.55$19.77$21.91$22.71Tangible book / shareTBVPS
Per-share growththe realized rate an owner's share compounded
9-yr5-yr
Revenue / share+6.0%/yr+4.7%/yr
Owner earnings / share+4.7%/yr+6.4%/yr
EPS+7.4%/yr+16.7%/yr
Dividends / share+6.9%/yr+3.4%/yr
Capital spending / share+0.1%/yr−27.0%/yr
Book value / share+3.4%/yr+2.5%/yr

The year, in the company's words

the filing →

Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.

  • Net interest income+13.8%
    “Net interest income increased by $29.2 million from 2024 to 2025, primarily driven by higher average yields earned on loans and investment securities, combined with lower average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and the payoff of the Company's subordinated notes.”
    ✓ figure matches the filed record
III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2025 10-K · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • Strong
    Net income $77M ÷ equity $593M
    Industry peers: median 10%
    What this means

    The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.

  • Solid
    Net income ÷ (equity − goodwill $0 − intangibles $0)
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.

  • Efficient (<65%)
    Noninterest expense $179M ÷ (net interest income + fees)
    Industry peers: median 61%
    What this means

    The share of revenue eaten by running costs; lower is better, and below about 60% marks a genuinely efficient operation. A low ratio held for years is the operational side of a moat.

Is it sound?

  • Capital (equity / assets) 8.0%
    Modest
    Equity $593M ÷ assets $7.4B
    What this means

    A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.

  • Deposit-funded
    Deposits $6.6B ÷ assets $7.4B
    What this means

    Low-cost, sticky deposits are a bank's real moat, the cheap raw material it lends out at a spread. A bank funded mostly by deposits earns more durably than one that rents its money in the wholesale market.

  • Credit cost (provision / NII) 5%
    Low
    Provision for credit losses $13M ÷ net interest income $241M
    What this means

    What the bank set aside this year against loans going bad, as a share of its lending income. This swings hard with the cycle, low in good years and spiking in recessions, so read it across the record, not in one year. Disciplined underwriting shows up as low, stable provisions through a downturn.

The franchise and the credit cycle

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The deposit mix isn't cleanly tagged in the filings' structured data; the funding read above carries what is.

  • Disciplined book
    Charge-offs net of recoveries $12M ÷ loans $5.3B (avg of year-ends) · worst year on record 0.29% · allowance held at 1.13% of loans
    What this means

    Loans actually written off, net of what was later recovered — the realized truth the provisions were guessing at. Graham's rule applies doubly here: the worst year in the record, not the average, is the read, because a loan book's sins are committed in the good years and confessed in the bad ones.

  • Manageable
    Pre-tax, as filed for FY2025: HTM at cost $562M − fair value $496M = $67M, against stated equity $593M · widest on record FY2024: $90M (26% accreted back since)
    What this means

    Bonds held to maturity are carried at cost, so rate rises open a gap that only shows in this disclosure. Stated equity already carries every available-for-sale mark through accumulated other comprehensive income; the held-to-maturity book's gap sits outside equity, which is why it is read here. The figure is pre-tax as the filer states it — the true after-tax dent depends on a deferred-tax position the record does not carry. The gap never hits earnings if the bank can hold on, which is precisely why the reader checks whether it could be forced to sell: the 2023 bank failures were this number meeting deposit flight. The funding leg: the filer states uninsured deposits only on a netted basis the record cannot verify — withheld rather than shown unchecked.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Management, ownership & pay

read the proxy →

From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.

Fiscal yearChief executivePay, as filed“Actually paid”Owner earnings
2021$3.5M$4.9M$104M
2022Paul K. Yonamine$2.8M$1.4M$107M
2023Arnold D. Martines$1.7M$1.6M$98M
2024$2.1M$2.7M$84M
2025$2.8M$3.4M$92M

Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years. A dash under the name means the filing tags the figure without naming the officer.

  • Insider ownership1.7%

    The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.

  • Stock-based compensation$2M

    The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 0.8% of revenue, equal to 1.3% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.

What an owner would ask, FY2025

read the 10-K →
  • How much of the deposit base could leave overnight?
    withheld

    the filing states its uninsured deposits on a netted basis ("Excluding fully collateralized…"), which cannot be checked against the deposits line the record carries — withheld rather than shown unverifiedverify →

The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.

Peers, Banks

The same industry, side by side on the bank lens. Each column names the period it is read over; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.

CompanyRevenuelatest FY, USDROEmedian over the recordROTCEmedian over the recordEfficiencymedian over the recordNII / assetsmedian over the recordNoninterest-bearing sharelatest FY
UVSPUnivest Financial Corporation$328M9%11%63%2.8%20%
MSBIMidland States Bancorp Inc.$325M7%11%66%3.2%19%
EGBNEagle Bancorp Inc.$299M11%12%41%2.9%16%
CPFCentral Pacific Financial Corp New$293M11%12%64%3.0%
CTBICommunity Trust Bancorp Inc.$283M11%12%56%3.2%23%
CCNECNB Financial Corporation$282M10%12%64%3.1%16%
FMNBFarmers National Banc Corp.$280M12%14%61%3.1%23%
THFFFirst Financial Corporation$262M9%11%61%3.4%20%
Group median10%12%62%3.1%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / tangible book

A bank is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what Central Pacific Financial Corp New’s record justifies.

$
The assumptions

Tangible book / share, delivered3%/yr’20→’25

The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A bank earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a bank.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / tangible book
Justified by the return
Normalized return on tangible equity12%
Price / book
Earnings yield
P/E (3-yr avg ’23–’25)
Graham’s price gate

Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.

Tangible book $596M on 26M shares, a 12% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the bank keeps earning that return; a credit cycle, a rate shock or a bad acquisition changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Central Pacific Financial Corp New (CPF), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/CPF, data as of 2026-08-17.

Manual order: ← CPB its page in the Manual CPHI →

Industry order: ← COSO the Banks chapter CTBI →