← All companies ← CRSP Manual CRTO → ← AAPL Technology Hardware DBD →
CRSR, Corsair Gaming Inc.
Corsair Gaming Inc. is a leading global provider and innovator of high-performance products for gamers and digital creators such as streamers, vloggers and broadcasters.
Our PC components products offer our customers multiple options to build their customized gaming and workstation desktop PCs.
We design and sell high-performance gaming and streaming peripherals, components and systems to enthusiasts globally.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
Next report By 11/8 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~37 days after · the wire records it on arrival
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- Revenue is Gaming Components and Systems (67%) and Gamer and Creator Peripherals (33%).
- Situation
- Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Gross margin has run about 25% and operating margin about 1.4% through the cycle, a thin spread that turns the result on volume and the cost of what it sells far more than on the price it sets. On a spread this thin the operating result swings hard on small moves in cost or volume — it has ranged from −4.0% to 9.3% over the years, so the cost line is where the needle moves. Inventory runs near 16% of sales, so how fast it turns back into cash — and the risk of writing it down when demand softens — sits alongside the margin. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on customer concentration, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has rarely cleared the cost of capital (median 1%, above 15% in 2 of 5 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. The cycle and the balance sheet decide this one; the worst year tells more than the median, and the rest is in the 10-K.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Gaming Components and Systems is 67% of revenue, with Gamer and Creator Peripherals the other meaningful segment at 33%.
- Gaming Components and Systems67%$980M
- Gamer and Creator Peripherals33%$492M
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2018–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||
| $938M | $1.1B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $1.5B | $1.5B | RevenueRevenue |
| $193M | $224M | $465M | $514M | $297M | $360M | $328M | $426M | $458M | Gross profitGross prof. |
| 21% | 20% | 27% | 27% | 22% | 25% | 25% | 29% | 32% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| 15% | 15% | 15% | 17% | 21% | 20% | 24% | 24% | 24% | SG&A / revenueSG&A/rev |
| 3% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 5% | 4% | 5% | 5% | 5% | R&D / revenueR&D/rev |
| $22M | $24M | $158M | $138M | ($55M) | $10M | ($50M) | $2M | $43M | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 2.3% | 2.2% | 9.3% | 7.2% | −4.0% | 0.7% | −3.8% | 0.1% | 2.9% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($11M) | ($13M) | $122M | $115M | ($64M) | ($3M) | ($62M) | ($12M) | — | Pretax incomePretax |
| ($14M) | ($8M) | $103M | $101M | ($54M) | ($3M) | ($85M) | ($16M) | $37M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| — | — | 15% | 12% | — | — | — | — | 2% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||
| $422K | $37M | $169M | $20M | $66M | $89M | $36M | $50M | $106M | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $6M | $7M | $9M | $10M | $11M | $12M | $13M | $14M | $14M | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $6M | $34M | $51M | ($108M) | $88M | $49M | $77M | $19M | $27M | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $8M | $9M | $9M | $11M | $26M | $13M | $10M | $15M | $16M | CapexCapex |
| 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 1.9% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 1.1% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($5M) | $28M | $160M | $9M | $56M | $76M | $26M | $35M | $90M | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −0.6% | 2.6% | 9.4% | 0.5% | 4.0% | 5.2% | 2.0% | 2.4% | 6.2% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($8M) | $28M | $160M | $9M | $40M | $76M | $26M | $35M | $90M | Free cash flowFCF |
| −0.8% | 2.6% | 9.4% | 0.5% | 2.9% | 5.2% | 2.0% | 2.4% | 6.2% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| $30M | $126M | $1M | $5M | $20M | $14M | $43M | — | $43M | AcquisitionsAcquis. |
| ($39M) | ($145M) | ($10M) | ($21M) | ($47M) | ($27M) | ($53M) | ($15M) | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| $47M | $132M | ($79M) | ($65M) | $73M | ($37M) | ($51M) | ($49M) | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| ($331K) | $37K | $2M | ($2M) | ($3M) | ($281K) | ($1M) | $3M | — | Exchange-rate effectFX |
| $9M | $24M | $82M | ($68M) | $89M | $25M | ($69M) | ($11M) | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| — | — | 21% | 16% | -6% | 1% | -6% | — | 7% | ROICROIC |
| -8% | -4% | 24% | 18% | -9% | -0% | -14% | -3% | 6% | Return on equityROE |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||
| $28M | $52M | $134M | $65M | $154M | $179M | $110M | $99M | $194M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $202M | $294M | $291M | $236M | $253M | $219M | $234M | $160M | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| — | $151M | $226M | $298M | $193M | $240M | $260M | $303M | $265M | InventoryInvent. |
| — | $182M | $300M | $236M | $172M | $240M | $207M | $213M | $179M | Accounts payablePayables |
| — | $171M | $220M | $353M | $256M | $253M | $271M | $325M | $246M | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| — | $430M | $691M | $706M | $623M | $712M | $623M | $665M | $647M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| — | $300M | $505M | $447M | $343M | $418M | $396M | $431M | $369M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| — | 1.4× | 1.4× | 1.6× | 1.8× | 1.7× | 1.6× | 1.5× | 1.8× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| — | $15M | $16M | $17M | $35M | $32M | $30M | $32M | — | Net PP&ENet PP&E |
| $227M | $313M | $313M | $317M | $348M | $355M | $354M | $358M | $357M | GoodwillGoodwill |
| — | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.2B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $506M | $321M | $248M | $239M | $198M | $174M | $121M | $118M | Total debtDebt |
| — | $454M | $188M | $182M | $85M | $20M | $64M | $23M | ($76M) | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 0.7× | 0.7× | 4.5× | 7.8× | -5.7× | 0.6× | -3.8× | 0.2× | 5.6× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| — | $843M | $877M | $769M | $642M | $663M | $616M | $608M | — | Total liabilitiesTotal liab. |
| — | — | — | — | $21M | $16M | $15M | $12M | — | Redeemable interestsRedeemable |
| $163M | $217M | $437M | $568M | $624M | $668M | $604M | $634M | $665M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 1.6% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 2.2% | 1.9% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||
| 75.5M | 76.2M | 90.6M | 100M | 96.3M | 106M | 104M | 106M | 108M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $12.42 | $14.39 | $18.79 | $19.04 | $14.28 | $13.74 | $12.64 | $13.89 | $13.38 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.18 | $-0.11 | $1.14 | $1.01 | $-0.56 | $-0.02 | $-0.82 | $-0.15 | $0.34 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-0.07 | $0.37 | $1.77 | $0.09 | $0.58 | $0.72 | $0.25 | $0.33 | $0.83 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-0.10 | $0.37 | $1.77 | $0.09 | $0.42 | $0.72 | $0.25 | $0.33 | $0.83 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.11 | $0.12 | $0.10 | $0.11 | $0.27 | $0.12 | $0.09 | $0.15 | $0.15 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $2.16 | $2.84 | $4.83 | $5.68 | $6.48 | $6.28 | $5.80 | $5.98 | $6.13 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 7-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +1.6%/yr | −5.9%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | — | −28.6%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +3.9%/yr | +7.9%/yr |
| Book value / share | +15.7%/yr | +4.4%/yr |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Gaming Components and Systems+16.2%
“Gaming Components and Systems Segment Net revenue of the Gaming Components and Systems segment increased $136.7 million, or 16.2%, in 2025 as compared to 2024 primarily led by strong growth in memory and components, driven by strong demand for system upgrades and new builds among performance-focused PC builders, as well as higher average selling prices for certain memory products in the latter part of 2025.”
✓ figure matches the filed record
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedBeyond op. cashEach year's outlays against its operating cash: the mix, and how it drifts. The hatched cap is spending beyond that year's operating cash — financed from the balance sheet or borrowing, not operations.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business turned a $16M loss into $35M of owner earnings: more cash than the profit line showed, after the non-cash charges and the capital it put back in.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($16M) | ($85M) | ($3M) | ($54M) | $101M |
| Depreciationnon-cash charge added back | +$14M | +$13M | +$12M | +$11M | +$10M |
| Amortization of intangible assetsnon-cash charge added back; the purchase price of past acquisitions, expensed over time | +$40M | +$38M | +$38M | +$40M | +$35M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$33M | +$31M | +$31M | +$22M | +$17M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$21M | +$39M | +$10M | +$48M | −$143M |
| Cash from operations | $50M | $36M | $89M | $66M | $20M |
| Maintenance capital expenditurethe spending needed just to hold position and volume | −$15M | −$10M | −$13M | −$11M | −$11M |
| Owner earnings | $35M | $26M | $76M | $56M | $9M |
| Growth capital expenditurediscretionary; spent to get bigger, not to stand still | — | — | — | −$16M | — |
| Free cash flow | $35M | $26M | $76M | $40M | $9M |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | 2% | 2% | 5% | 4% | 0% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $33M), owner earnings is nearer $2M.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Does not cover its interestOperating income $2M ÷ interest expense $9M
What this means
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $23M · 10.8× operating profitHeavy net debtCash $99M − debt $121M
What this means
Netting $99M of cash and short-term investments against $121M of debt leaves $23M owed, about 10.8× a year's operating profit (58.4× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Long (60+ days)DSO 58 + DIO 106 − DPO 74 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Below average through the cycle5-yr median, range -6%–21%; the latest year is left out — large non-operating charges put its operating line well above pretax profitIndustry peers: median -1%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 5 years, so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Thin, recently turned positivelatest $35M = operating cash $50M − maintenance capex $15M; positive each of the last 3 years, after an earlier loss stretch (8-yr median 2%)Industry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's 2% of revenue this year, a 2% median across 8 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $33M of SBC) leaves $2M.
- Loss, but cash-generativeNet income ($16M) · cash from operations $50M
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.10×MaintainingCapex $15M ÷ property depreciation $14M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
The promise and the pay packet
- Is the buyback buying ownership, or mopping up? 2.2%The count is risingStock compensation $33M (fiscal 2025), 2.2% of revenue · no repurchases · diluted shares +10.1% since 2022
What this means
Stock handed to employees is a real cost paid in the owner's own currency: it is charged against profit, but the shares it creates are permanent. Many companies repurchase stock at the same time, which looks like a return of capital and often is not — if the count barely moves, the cash merely cancelled the pay packet and bought the owner nothing. The three states worth telling apart are a count genuinely shrinking, a count standing still despite large repurchases, and a count rising because the issuance was never offset at all.
Graham’s defensive tests · 1 of 6 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size NearRevenue ≥ $2B · $1.5B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity NearCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.54×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Conservative debt PassDebt ≤ working capital · $121M vs $235M WC
What this means
Graham's rule that borrowings not exceed net current assets. Capital-heavy and buyback-heavy firms routinely fail it, read it next to interest coverage, not alone.
- Earnings stability MissA profit every year (8-yr record) · 6 loss years
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 1 of 8 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth MissEarnings +33% over the record · −228%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.32/share (latest year $-0.15), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $5.86/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2018–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 2 of 8
What this means
Lost money in 6 year(s), look at what happened there before trusting the average.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 2 of 7 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 5% → −1% (3-yr avg ends)
In the filing’s words The filing attributes gains to higher prices, but the margin in the record has not followed — the claim outruns the result here.
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin slipped — about 5% early to −1% lately, median 1% — competition or costs are biting in.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC returns capital
What this means
The capital base barely grew: this business returns cash through dividends and buybacks rather than reinvesting. Judge it on the cash returned, not on compounding.
- Owner earnings growth +15%/yr
What this means
Owner earnings grew about 15% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2022 · −4.0% op. margin
What this means
Operations went underwater in 2022, understand why before trusting the good years.
- Share count +5.0%/yr
What this means
The share count is rising, dilution works against you on a per-share basis.
- Dividend record paid
What this means
Paid a dividend in 1 of the years on record.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Jun 30, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$194M
- Receivables$160M
- Inventory$265M
- Other current assets$29M
- Debt due within a year$6M
- Accounts payable$179M
- Other current liabilities$184M
From the company's latest filing.
How the cash was used, 2018–2025
Over the record, the business generated $468M of operating cash; how management split it reads as a cash builder, a large share of cash simply built up on the balance sheet.
- Reinvested$101M · 22%
- Dividends$85M · 18%
- Buybacks$2M · 0%
- Retained (debt / cash)$280M · 60%
- Returned to owners$87M
22% of the owner earnings the business produced over the span, $85M as dividends and $2M as buybacks.
- Source of fundingOperating cash
Operating cash covered reinvestment and returns; over the span cash and short-term investments rose $166M.
- Average price paid for buybacks—
Buybacks ran $2M over the span, but the filings don't tag the share count needed to deduce the average price paid.
- Net change in share count43.8%
The diluted count rose from 75M to 108M: issuance (stock pay, deals) outran any buybacks, so owners were diluted on net.
- Dividend record$1.13/sh
Paid in 1 of the years on record. It was never cut over the span.
Buybacks are gross of stock issued to staff; the share-count line above is the net of that, the figure that decides whether owners gained. The average price paid blends a year of purchases (and any accelerated repurchase), so it is close, not exact. The record of where the cash went and on what terms.
Acquisitions & goodwill
from the balance sheet & the 8-year cash-flow recordGoodwill grows only when a company acquires and falls only when it concedes it overpaid. The size of that bet, the cash put into buying rather than building, and how much has already been written off.
None written down over the record; the goodwill is still carried at full cost. That is the deals holding their value on the books so far; whether they keep doing so is the test an owner watches, since the write-down, when it comes, is the admission the price was too high.
Beside that spending sits $287M of cumulative amortization of acquired intangibles charged against earnings since fiscal 2018 — the purchase price of past deals, expensed over time.
Goodwill, acquired intangibles and equity from the latest balance sheet; acquisition spend and amortization summed across the company's full tagged history, write-downs across the 8-year record, from the company's own filings.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Thi La | $10.2M | −$234k | $9M |
| 2022 | Thi La | $9.9M | $4.5M | $56M |
| 2023 | Thi La | $6.7M | $4.9M | $76M |
| 2024 | Thi La | $6.0M | −$584k | $26M |
| 2025 | Thi La | $1.2M | $3.8M | $35M |
| 2025 | Thi La | $8.0M | $5.5M | $35M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership54.5%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio210:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$33M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 2.2% of revenue, equal to 1595.0% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- How much of the revenue rides on one buyer?≈$398M · 27% of revenue on the largest customers (TTM)
“Further, a limited number of retailers and distributors represent a significant portion of our net revenue, with e-retailer Amazon accounting for 27.4%, 30.9%, and 30.7% of our net revenue for 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively, and sales to our ten largest customers accounting for approximately 49.…”verify →
- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Technology Hardware
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Gross marginmedian over the record | Op. marginmedian over the record | ROICmedian over the record | Owner earn. marginmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XRXXerox Holdings Corporation | $7.0B | 5%2y | -0.4% | -2% | 8% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc. | $6.8B | 77% | 20.5% | 141%1y | 36% |
| LOGILogitech International S.A. | $4.8B | 40% | 11.9% | 63% | 12% |
| NATLNCR Atleos Corporation | $4.4B | — | 7.0% | 10% | 6% |
| PEverpure Inc. | $3.7B | 69% | -8.1% | -12% | 12% |
| VYXNCR Voyix Corporation | $2.7B | 68%2y | 2.0% | 1% | 10% |
| CRSRCorsair Gaming Inc. | $1.5B | 25% | 1.4% | 1% | 2% |
| SSYSStratasys Ltd. Ordinary Shares (Israel) | $551M | 44% | -13.0% | -8% | -0% |
| Group median | — | 44% | 1.7% | 1% | 9% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFType today's close and see the owner-earnings growth you'd have to believe to justify it, beside what Corsair Gaming Inc. has delivered.
Through the cycle, Corsair Gaming Inc. earns about $36M on its 2.5% median owner-earnings margin. This year’s 2.4% margin runs in line with that. Normalize, below, values the price on that through-cycle figure rather than the latest year.
—
9.0% = the 4.71% 10-year Treasury (Aug 18, 2026) + 4.29 points of equity premium. The rate you require is yours to set.
Enter a price above to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Graham capped the multiple at 15×; Buffett and Munger let that rule go: a wonderful business can deserve 50× if the thesis holds. The gate marks the bargain-hunter's floor.
Prefilled with the 10-year Treasury (4.71%, as of Aug 18, 2026). Edit it for today’s exact figure, or a AAA corporate yield.
Graham measured a stock against the bond you could own instead, the heart of his margin of safety. Enter a price above to weigh the owner-earnings yield against this bond.
Owner earnings $90M on 108M shares outstanding, per the 10-Q cover, as of 2026-07-28; net cash $76M. The base is the latest year by default; Normalize values it on the through-cycle median owner-earnings margin (to avoid paying on a peak year). Net of stock comp treats option pay as the expense it is. The dials set the multiple a growth belief justifies; the price, and every dollar on this page, is yours.
Manual order: ← CRSP its page in the Manual CRTO →
Industry order: ← AAPL the Technology Hardware chapter DBD →