← All companies ← RYAAY Manual RYOJ → ← RPD Software RZLV →
RYET, Ruanyun Edai Technology Inc.
A software business, earning high margins on code once it is written.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No meaningful revenue yet; the record is the cash on hand against the burn.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run around −23% through the cycle on a 32% gross margin, the operating line deeply negative — so the lever is the path to a margin at all: revenue growth against the cost curve and the cash runway, not the level of a margin that isn't there yet. The cash cycle has run negative through the cycle (a median of −23 days): the operation is paid before it pays, so working capital releases cash as the business grows rather than tying it up. Read this kind of business on retention and the cost of growth. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on supplier & input dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2024–2026
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2024’24 | 2025’25 | 2026’26 | TTMTTMMar 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||
| $9M | $7M | $7M | $7M | RevenueRevenue |
| $3M | $4M | $2M | $2M | Gross profitGross prof. |
| 32% | 57% | 25% | 25% | Gross marginGross mgn |
| ($2M) | ($486K) | ($7M) | ($7M) | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| −23.2% | −7.3% | −97.8% | −97.8% | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| ($2M) | ($520K) | ($8M) | ($8M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | ||||
| ($799K) | ($2M) | ($9M) | ($9M) | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $415K | $241K | $167K | $167K | DepreciationDeprec. |
| $890K | ($2M) | ($1M) | ($1M) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $4K | $144K | $65K | $65K | CapexCapex |
| 0.0% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($804K) | ($2M) | ($9M) | ($9M) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −8.8% | −29.4% | −123.2% | −123.2% | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($804K) | ($2M) | ($9M) | ($9M) | Free cash flowFCF |
| −8.8% | −29.4% | −123.2% | −123.2% | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| -697% | — | -102% | -102% | ROICROIC |
| -876% | — | -139% | -139% | Return on equityROE |
| −876% | — | −139% | −139% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | ||||
| $2M | $3M | $840K | $840K | ReceivablesReceiv. |
| $210K | $59K | $18K | $18K | InventoryInvent. |
| $2M | $1M | $2M | $2M | Accounts payablePayables |
| $182K | $2M | ($1M) | ($1M) | Operating working capitalOper. WC |
| $4M | $4M | $12M | $12M | Current assetsCur. assets |
| $5M | $6M | $9M | $9M | Current liabilitiesCur. liab. |
| 0.8× | 0.7× | 1.4× | 1.4× | Current ratioCurr. ratio |
| $405K | $460K | $470K | $470K | Net PP&ENet PP&E |
| $5M | $6M | $14M | $14M | Total assetsAssets |
| $240K | ($162K) | $6M | $6M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | ||||
| 30.0M | 30.0M | 34.2M | 35.6M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $0.31 | $0.22 | $0.22 | $0.21 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $-0.07 | $-0.02 | $-0.23 | $-0.22 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-0.03 | $-0.07 | $-0.27 | $-0.26 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-0.03 | $-0.07 | $-0.27 | $-0.26 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $0.01 | $-0.01 | $0.17 | $0.16 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2026 the business reported a $8M loss but ($9M) of owner earnings: $1M less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | ($8M) | ($520K) | ($2M) |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$167K | +$241K | +$415K |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$1M | −$2M | +$890K |
| Cash from operations | ($9M) | ($2M) | ($799K) |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$65K | −$144K | −$4K |
| Owner earnings | ($9M) | ($2M) | ($804K) |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -123% | -29% | -9% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position .
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- No meaningful interest burdenLittle or no interest expense reported
What this means
Little or no interest expense reported, the business isn't leaning on lenders to operate.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Negative, funded by othersDSO 41 + DIO 1 − DPO 129 days
What this means
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”), the company grows on other people's money.
Is it a good business?
- Not enough dataIndustry peers: median -47%
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Consumes cash through the cycle3-yr median margin, range -123%–-9%; latest ($9M) = operating cash ($9M) − maintenance capex $65KIndustry peers: median -46%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -123% of revenue this year, a -29% median across 3 years.
- Loss, and burning cashNet income ($8M) · cash from operations ($9M)
What this means
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash, here, they did not.
How is the cash used?
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.39×HarvestingCapex $65K ÷ depreciation $167K
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Graham’s defensive tests · 0 of 2 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size MissRevenue ≥ $2B · $7M
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity MissCurrent ratio ≥ 2× · 1.36×
What this means
Current assets at least twice current liabilities, near-term bills covered without touching the business. Strict by design: many cash-rich modern firms run leaner and miss it, holding their cushion in longer-dated securities.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $-0.10/share (latest year $-0.22), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $0.16/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Mar 31, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Receivables$840K
- Inventory$18K
- Other current assets$12M
- Accounts payable$2M
- Other current liabilities$7M
From the company's latest filing.
Peers, Software
The same industry, side by side on owner economics and what the growth costs. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Gross marginmedian over the record | Op. marginmedian over the record | ROICmedian over the record | Owner earn. marginmedian over the record | Sales & marketinglatest FY | Stock paylatest FY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDVTRed Violet Inc. Common Stock | $90M | — | -3.0% | -3% | 20% | 24.1% | 7.2% |
| SVCOSilvaco Group Inc. | $63M | 80% | -67.5% | -40% | -34% | 29.0% | 17.1% |
| YXTYXT.COM GROUP HOLDING LIMITED | $50M | 58% | -67.0% | -1156%1y | -63% | — | — |
| ALARALARUM TECHNOLOGIES LTD. | $41M | 49% | -169.9% | -59% | -115% | — | — |
| HPAIHelport AI Limited | $35M | 58% | 33.9% | 78% | — | — | — |
| RYETRuanyun Edai Technology Inc. | $7M | 32% | -23.2% | -400%2y | -29% | — | — |
| BMRBeamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share | $3M | 97% | -44.2% | -54% | -28% | — | — |
| BLIVBeLive Holdings Ordinary Share | $1M | 55% | 39.2%1y | 62%1y | -35%2y | — | — |
| Group median | — | 58% | -33.7% | -47% | -34% | — | — |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Ruanyun Edai Technology Inc.'s US listing is the ordinary share itself. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed.
Ruanyun Edai Technology Inc. is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.
Enter a price to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.
Manual order: ← RYAAY its page in the Manual RYOJ →
Industry order: ← RPD the Software chapter RZLV →