Owner Scorecard


← All companies ← WDS Manual WFG → ← WBS Banks WFC →

WF, Woori Financial Group Inc.

Banks financial

We are one of the largest financial holding companies in Korea, in terms of consolidated total assets, and our operations include Woori Bank, one of the largest commercial banks in Korea.

Latest annual: FY2024 20-F · figures as filed, in KRW · 1 ADS = 3 ordinary shares
WF · Woori Financial Group Inc.
I

The business

What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.

Revenue · FY2024
₩11.76T
+4.0% YoY · 9% 5-yr CAGR
Vital signs · FY2024, with 5-yr average
Revenue ₩11.76T 5-yr avg ₩10.22T
Return on equity 9% 5-yr avg 9%
Return on tangible equity 9% 5-yr avg 9%
Equity / assets 6.5% 5-yr avg 6.1%

The business in brief

read the 10-K →

What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.

What moves the needle
Net interest margin, loan losses, and book value. A lender is read on the quality of its balance sheet, not an earnings multiple, and the worst year of credit losses matters more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on supplier & input dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Is it a good business?
Return on equity has sat below the cost of equity (median 8%, above 12% in only 0 of 10 years). The cycle and the loan book decide this one; weigh the recession years in the record, not the average, and read the 10-K.

Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.

II

The record

Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.

III

Quality & stewardship

Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.

Owner’s Scorecard

FY2024 20-F · source on SEC EDGAR →

Is it a good business?

  • Below the cost of equity
    Net income ₩3.09T ÷ equity ₩34.10T
    Industry peers: median 12%
    What this means

    The bank's north star, what it earns on shareholders' capital. Cost of equity is roughly 10%, so a return durably above that builds value and below it destroys it. One year is noisy; the durability across a full credit cycle is what counts.

  • Modest
    Net income ÷ (equity − goodwill ₩482.7B − intangibles ₩0)
    Industry peers: median 16%
    What this means

    The cleaner return, stripping out the goodwill paid for past acquisitions. This is the number a buyer of the whole bank actually earns on the hard capital.

  • Not enough data
    Industry peers: median 27%
    What this means

    Noninterest expense or revenue missing.

Is it sound?

  • Capital (equity / assets) 6.5%
    Modest
    Equity ₩34.10T ÷ assets ₩525.75T
    What this means

    A plain-English leverage read: how much of the balance sheet is the owners' own money. This is a rough proxy; the regulatory figure is the CET1 ratio, which is risk-weighted and reported in the filing. The point is the same, how much loss the bank can absorb before depositors are at risk.

  • Deposit-funded
    Deposits ₩366.82T ÷ assets ₩525.75T
    What this means

    Low-cost, sticky deposits are a bank's real moat, the cheap raw material it lends out at a spread. A bank funded mostly by deposits earns more durably than one that rents its money in the wholesale market.

  • Credit cost
    Not enough data
    What this means

    Provision or net interest income missing.

The franchise and the credit cycle

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    The deposit mix isn't cleanly tagged in the filings' structured data; the funding read above carries what is.

  • Not enough data
    What this means

    Not derivable from the filings' structured data — some filers carry recoveries only on segment axes, and a gross figure dressed as net would be a wrong number.

All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.

Peers, Banks

The same industry, side by side on the bank lens. Each column names the period it is read over; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.

CompanyRevenuelatest FY, USDROEmedian over the recordROTCEmedian over the recordEfficiencymedian over the recordNII / assetsmedian over the recordNoninterest-bearing sharelatest FY
BMOBank Of Montreal$16.4B11%13%1.5%
BSBRBanco Santander Brasil SA$16.0B12%29%27%4.8%
WFWoori Financial Group Inc.$8.5B8%8%1.7%
CMCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce$8.2B13%16%1.2%
HBANHuntington Bancshares Incorporated$8.2B10%14%62%2.8%18%
NTRSNorthern Trust Corporation$8.1B12%13%70%1.2%19%
BAPCredicorp Ltd.$5.4B16%18%23%4.8%
GGALGrupo Financiero Galicia S.A.$4.3B26%27%27%12.2%
Group median12%15%2.2%
IV

The price

What a price has to assume.

What the price implies

price / tangible book

Enter the US price, in dollars: the NYSE/Nasdaq quote you hold. Per the filing's own cover, “American Depositary Shares , each representing three shares of Common”; Woori Financial Group Inc. reports in KRW, so every figure in this tool is stated per ADS and translated at KRW 1 = $0.0007 (2026-08-20, reference rate) so your dollar quote reconciles exactly. The record tables elsewhere on this page remain as filed, in KRW.

A bank is worth a multiple of its tangible book value, and the multiple it deserves is set by the return it earns on that book. Type today’s price; we show what you would be paying against what Woori Financial Group Inc.’s record justifies.

$
The assumptions

Tangible book / share, delivered9%/yr’19→’24

The justified multiple is (return on tangible equity − growth) ÷ (cost of equity − growth). A bank earning exactly its cost of equity is worth about one times tangible book; the premium above that prices each point of durable excess return. A higher cost of equity lowers the justified multiple for a bank.

Enter a price above to run it.

Price / tangible book
Justified by the return
Normalized return on tangible equity8%
Price / book
Earnings yield
P/E (3-yr avg ’22–’24)
Graham’s price gate

Graham applied the same standards to financial enterprises (Intelligent Investor ch.14): the 15× multiple cap on averaged earnings, and P/E times price-to-book at most 22.5. The gate marks the bargain-hunter’s floor, not a verdict.

Tangible book $24.2B on 245M shares, a 8% normalized return on it. The dials set the multiple such a return would justify; your price sets the multiple you are paying. It assumes the bank keeps earning that return; a credit cycle, a rate shock or a bad acquisition changes it, which is what the record and the 10-K are for.

Cite: Owner Scorecard, "Woori Financial Group Inc. (WF), the owner's record," https://ownerscorecard.com/c/WF, data as of 2026-08-17.

Manual order: ← WDS its page in the Manual WFG →

Industry order: ← WBS the Banks chapter WFC →