← All companies ← FOXF Manual FPI → ← FCPT REITs — Specialty & Diversified FPI →
FPH, Five Point Holdings LLC Class A
Revenue is Great Park (49%), Valencia (39%) and Hearthstone (11%).
The graph assumes $100 was invested at the market close on December 31, 2020 in our Class A common shares, the S&P 500 and the S&P Homebuilders Select Industry Index, and the reinvestment of all dividends.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
Next report Est. 10/21–11/2 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~25 days after · the wire records it on arrival
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What it is
- A property business, read on funds from operations and net asset value rather than reported earnings.
- What moves the needle
- Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on concentrated dependence, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
Where the money comes from
read the 10-K →Revenue spreads across 4 segments, the largest Great Park at 49%.
- Great Park49%$54M
- Valencia39%$43M
- Hearthstone11%$12M
- San Francisco0%$0
From the segment footnote of the company's own 10-K. Shares are of total revenue; the profit bar shows each segment's share of segment operating profit, before unallocated corporate costs.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $39M | $139M | $49M | $184M | $154M | $224M | $43M | $212M | $238M | $110M | $117M | RevenueRevenue |
| ($33M) | $73M | ($35M) | $9M | ($428K) | $7M | ($15M) | $55M | $68M | $71M | $53M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $3M | $2M | $13M | $21M | $14M | $26M | $17M | $20M | $19M | $9M | $9M | Depreciation & amortizationD&A |
| ($125M) | ($58M) | ($343M) | ($232M) | ($78M) | ($81M) | ($188M) | $154M | $116M | $105M | $65M | Cash from operationsOp. cash |
| $82M | ($57M) | $579K | $311K | $53M | $75M | $64M | $77M | $70M | ($7M) | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| ($5M) | $900M | ($10M) | $83M | ($24M) | ($27M) | ($10M) | ($9M) | ($109M) | ($104M) | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| ($48M) | $785M | ($353M) | ($149M) | ($49M) | ($33M) | ($134M) | $222M | $77M | ($5M) | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $1.4B | $1.5B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $2.5B | $2.5B | Real estate (gross)RE gross |
| $2.1B | $3.0B | $2.9B | $3.0B | $3.0B | $2.9B | $2.9B | $3.0B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $3.2B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | 19% | 19% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 22% | 21% | 17% | 14% | 14% | Debt / assetsDebt/assets |
| $69M | $561M | $557M | $616M | $618M | $619M | $621M | $622M | $526M | $443M | $444M | Total debtDebt |
| $7M | ($288M) | $61M | $269M | $319M | $354M | $489M | $268M | $95M | $18M | $96M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | — | — | $0 | Interest expenseInt. exp. |
| $606M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $993M | $962M | $896M | $860M | — | Total liabilitiesTotal liab. |
| — | — | $0 | $25M | $25M | $25M | $25M | $25M | $25M | $70M | — | Redeemable interestsRedeemable |
| $1.5B | $1.9B | $1.8B | $1.9B | $1.9B | $1.9B | $1.9B | $2.0B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $2.3B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
The year, in the company's words
the filing →Verbatim from the 10-K's management discussion. Each sentence is shown only because its subject, direction, and stated figures check out against the filed numbers on this page. The words are the company's; the arithmetic is the record's.
- Revenue-53.8%
“Revenues decreased by $127.9 million, to $110.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, from $237.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to lower land sales at our Valencia segment in 2025 compared to 2024 and a decrease in management services revenue at our Great Park segment in 2025, partially offset by management services revenue recognized at our new Hearthstone segment.”
✓ figure matches the filed record
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- What an owner could take out $105M to $105MA range, because the filings do not split maintenance from expansionBetween cash from operations less all capital spending $105M − $217K = $105M, and cash from operations $105M
What this means
Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.
- Ordinary for propertyCash from operations $105M ÷ real estate at cost $2.5B
What this means
The cash the properties throw off, measured against what they cost to acquire and build rather than against a market value nobody filed. Read it across the record: a portfolio whose yield on cost is rising is either raising rents faster than it is adding buildings, or buying well. Gross cost is used deliberately, so accumulated depreciation cannot shrink the denominator and flatter the return.
- Not enough data
What this means
No dividends are tagged in the structured data within the record's window — either none were paid, or the filer reports them under a variant tag the pipeline does not yet read. The financing section of the 10-K settles which.
- Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
What this means
Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.
Is it sound?
- Debt / assets 14%ConservativeTotal debt $443M ÷ assets $3.2BIndustry peers: median 26%
What this means
Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.
- Not enough data
What this means
Operating income or interest is missing, or operating income sits far below net income (a triple-net REIT's lease income bypasses the operating line), so an EBITDA coverage would mislead — read it on net income against the interest bill, and on debt / assets, instead.
- Consolidated accounts only
What this means
These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Emile Haddad | $9.2M | $8.7M | ($82M) |
| 2021 | Lynn Jochim | $4.4M | $4.2M | ($82M) |
| 2022 | Daniel Hedigan | $2.9M | $2.4M | ($188M) |
| 2022 | Lynn Jochim | $1.1M | $266k | ($188M) |
| 2023 | Daniel Hedigan | $4.0M | $4.5M | $154M |
| 2024 | Daniel Hedigan | $4.3M | $5.7M | $115M |
| 2025 | Daniel Hedigan | $8.2M | $11.8M | $105M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership16.7%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- Stock-based compensation$8M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 6.9% of revenue. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Acquisitions as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Specialty REITs
The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Cash marginmedian over the record | Cash / assetsmedian over the record | Dividend / cashmedian over the record | Debt / assetsmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRPMillrose Properties Inc. | $600M | 612%1y | 39.7%1y | 8%1y | 23%1y |
| JOESt. Joe Company (The) | $513M | 27% | 5.3% | 18% | 26% |
| FPHFive Point Holdings LLC Class A | $110M | -46% | -2.7% | — | 21% |
| LANDGladstone Land Corporation | $88M | 43% | 2.4% | 55% | 54% |
| TRCTejon Ranch Co | $50M | 31% | 2.1% | — | 12% |
| FRPHFRP Holdings Inc. | $43M | 70% | 4.0% | — | 25% |
| SKYHSky Harbour Group Corporation | $28M | -102% | -1.9% | — | 40% |
| MLPMaui Land & Pineapple Company Inc. | $19M | 14% | 4.4% | — | 18%1y |
| Group median | — | 29% | 3.2% | — | 24% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFA reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).
Manual order: ← FOXF its page in the Manual FPI →
Industry order: ← FCPT the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter FPI →