← All companies ← MLM Manual MLR → ← LINE REITs — Specialty & Diversified MRP →
MLP, Maui Land & Pineapple Company Inc.
A property business, read on funds from operations and net asset value rather than reported earnings.
Our leasing operations include commercial, agricultural, and industrial land and property leases, licensing of our registered trademarks and trade names, management of potable and non-potable water systems in West and Upcountry Maui, and stewardship of conservation areas.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
Next report By 11/13 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 45 days of period end · has filed ~45 days after · the wire records it on arrival
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Unprofitable. No meaningful revenue yet; the record is the cash on hand against the burn.
- What moves the needle
- Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on cyclicality & demand, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Operating cash per share has shrunk (−27% a year). The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
Revenue up 15.5% year over year
figures computed from the filing's XBRL
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $47M | $25M | $9M | $10M | $8M | $12M | $21M | $9M | $12M | $19M | $16M | RevenueRevenue |
| $22M | $11M | $498K | ($10M) | ($3M) | ($3M) | $2M | ($3M) | ($7M) | ($11M) | ($5M) | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $3M | $2M | $2M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $785K | $723K | $1M | — | Depreciation & amortizationD&A |
| $34M | $8M | $882K | $2M | $2M | $1M | $6M | ($1M) | $370K | $2M | $356K | Cash from operationsOp. cash |
| ($331K) | ($2M) | ($706K) | ($990K) | ($517K) | $4M | ($3M) | ($864K) | ($2M) | ($3M) | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| ($34M) | ($6M) | ($581K) | ($723K) | ($1M) | ($760K) | ($335K) | ($574K) | $3M | ($240K) | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| ($485K) | $427K | ($405K) | $59K | $186K | $5M | $3M | ($3M) | $1M | ($2M) | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $39M | $45M | $48M | $39M | $38M | $38M | $42M | $42M | $50M | $48M | $50M | Total assetsAssets |
| $7M | $1M | $1M | $1M | $200K | $0 | — | — | $0 | $4M | $9M | Total debtDebt |
| $6M | $206K | $611K | $352K | ($669K) | ($6M) | — | — | ($7M) | ($1M) | $5M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| — | — | — | — | $18M | $14M | $9M | $8M | $17M | $15M | — | Total liabilitiesTotal liab. |
| $18M | $31M | $31M | $23M | $20M | $24M | $34M | $35M | $33M | $33M | $31M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 18.9M | 19.0M | 19.1M | 19.2M | 19.3M | 19.4M | 19.4M | 19.7M | 19.6M | 19.7M | 19.9M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $0.94 | $1.64 | $1.62 | $1.18 | $1.04 | $1.22 | $1.74 | $1.76 | $1.69 | $1.68 | $1.56 | Book value / shareBVPS |
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −9.8%/yr | +20.4%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +27.9%/yr | +37.1%/yr |
| Book value / share | +6.7%/yr | +10.0%/yr |
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- What an owner could take out ($484K) to $2MA range, because the filings do not split maintenance from expansionBetween cash from operations less all capital spending $2M − $3M = ($484K), and cash from operations $2M
What this means
Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.
- Not enough data
What this means
Operating cash flow or the property cost wasn't found in the filing data.
- Not enough dataOccupancy at fiscal year end, in the filing’s words✓ each figure is its sentence’s own characters, dated to the fiscal year end inside the sentenceOccupancy, as filed — the scope is the sentence’s own words85%
“The following summarizes information related to our commercial, retail and industrial leases as of December 31, 2025: Total Average Lease Square Occupancy Expiration Footage Percentage Dates Kapalua Resort 72,169 85% 2026-2038 Other West Maui 40,050 98% 2025-2034 Upcountry Maui 135,109 82% 2026-2034 Agricultural Leases We own, market, and lease approximately 10,300 acres of diversified agriculture, ranching, renewable energy, eco tours, and activities in West and Upcountry Maui.”
What this means
No dividends are tagged in the structured data within the record's window — either none were paid, or the filer reports them under a variant tag the pipeline does not yet read. The financing section of the 10-K settles which.
- Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
What this means
Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.
Is it sound?
- Not cleanly capturedIndustry peers: median 25%
What this means
This REIT tags its borrowings in a way the pipeline could not fully total, so we decline to show a leverage figure rather than a misleadingly low one. The debt schedule in the 10-K is where to read its true leverage.
- Not enough data
What this means
Operating income or interest is missing, or operating income sits far below net income (a triple-net REIT's lease income bypasses the operating line), so an EBITDA coverage would mislead — read it on net income against the interest bill, and on debt / assets, instead.
- Consolidated accounts only
What this means
These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of the latest quarter, Jun 30, 2026Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investments$3M
- Receivables$2M
- Other current assets$3M
- Accounts payable$2M
- Other current liabilities$5M
From the company's latest filing.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Race. A. Randle | $601k | $601k | ($2M) |
| 2023 | Warren H. Haruki | $1.8M | $1.8M | ($2M) |
| 2024 | Race. A. Randle | $2.9M | $2.9M | ($2M) |
| 2025 | Race. A. Randle | $1.4M | $1.0M | ($484K) |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership68.6%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
What an owner would ask, FY2025
read the 10-K →- Which reported numbers are a judgment call?Management names Revenue recognition, Pension & retirement, Income taxes, Credit & receivables as critical estimates
each rests partly on management's judgment; the filing's note sets out the assumptionsverify →
The questions the record and the charts do not answer on their own; each carries the figure and the place to look.
Peers, Specialty REITs
The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Cash marginmedian over the record | Cash / assetsmedian over the record | Dividend / cashmedian over the record | Debt / assetsmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRPMillrose Properties Inc. | $600M | 612%1y | 39.7%1y | 8%1y | 23%1y |
| FPHFive Point Holdings LLC Class A | $110M | -46% | -2.7% | — | 21% |
| LANDGladstone Land Corporation | $88M | 43% | 2.4% | 55% | 54% |
| FPIFarmland Partners Inc. | $52M | 28% | 1.6% | 88% | 45% |
| TRCTejon Ranch Co | $50M | 31% | 2.1% | — | 12% |
| FRPHFRP Holdings Inc. | $43M | 70% | 4.0% | — | 25% |
| SKYHSky Harbour Group Corporation | $28M | -102% | -1.9% | — | 40% |
| MLPMaui Land & Pineapple Company Inc. | $19M | 14% | 4.4% | — | 18%1y |
| Group median | — | 29% | 2.2% | — | 24% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFA reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).
Manual order: ← MLM its page in the Manual MLR →
Industry order: ← LINE the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter MRP →