← All companies ← FROG Manual FRPT → ← FPI REITs — Specialty & Diversified FVR →
FRPH, FRP Holdings Inc.
A property business, read on funds from operations and net asset value rather than reported earnings.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
Next report By 11/13 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 45 days of period end · has filed ~39 days after · the wire records it on arrival
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- Occupancy, rents, and the cost of debt. Read on funds from operations and net asset value, because GAAP depreciation distorts the earnings, and a property downturn meets a balance sheet built on leverage. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Operating cash per share has shrunk (−3% a year). Debt is 28% of assets, conservative for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $37M | $16M | $22M | $24M | $24M | $31M | $37M | $42M | $42M | $43M | $43M | RevenueRevenue |
| $12M | $42M | $124M | $16M | $13M | $28M | $5M | $5M | $6M | $3M | $96K | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| $8M | $6M | $8M | $6M | $6M | $13M | $11M | $11M | $10M | $11M | $12M | Depreciation & amortizationD&A |
| $19M | $21M | ($37M) | $47M | $19M | $22M | $22M | $33M | $29M | $30M | $28M | Cash from operationsOp. cash |
| ($15M) | ($15M) | $91M | ($34M) | $51M | $67M | ($23M) | ($49M) | ($50M) | ($74M) | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| ($5M) | ($1M) | ($36M) | ($9M) | ($22M) | ($1M) | $17M | ($4M) | $13M | ($581K) | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| ($419K) | $5M | $18M | $4M | $47M | $88M | $16M | ($20M) | ($8M) | ($45M) | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $307M | $243M | $241M | $240M | $246M | — | — | — | — | — | — | Real estate (gross)RE gross |
| $265M | $419M | $505M | $538M | $536M | $678M | $701M | $709M | $728M | $735M | $762M | Total assetsAssets |
| 16% | 28% | 18% | 17% | 17% | 27% | 26% | 25% | 25% | 26% | 28% | Debt / assetsDebt/assets |
| $42M | $118M | $89M | $89M | $90M | $180M | $180M | $180M | $180M | $193M | $215M | Total debtDebt |
| $42M | $114M | $66M | $62M | $16M | $19M | $3M | $23M | $31M | $87M | $114M | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| $2M | $3M | $3M | $1M | $1M | $2M | $3M | $4M | $3M | $3M | $3M | Interest expenseInt. exp. |
| 10.5× | 0.4× | 0.6× | 5.5× | 4.7× | 1.0× | 2.6× | 2.7× | 3.7× | 2.4× | 1.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| $69M | $154M | $122M | $147M | $154M | $253M | $257M | $261M | $259M | $279M | — | Total liabilitiesTotal liab. |
| $196M | $244M | $365M | $375M | $368M | $396M | $407M | $415M | $423M | $429M | $429M | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 19.8M | 20.1M | 20.2M | 19.9M | 19.2M | 18.8M | 18.9M | 18.9M | 19.0M | 19.0M | 19.0M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $9.91 | $12.13 | $18.04 | $18.88 | $19.13 | $21.09 | $21.58 | $21.91 | $22.30 | $22.54 | $22.52 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2022 are restated ×2 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +2.0%/yr | +12.9%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | +6.1%/yr | +8.0%/yr |
| EPS | −12.9%/yr | −23.3%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | +7.6%/yr | +24.1%/yr |
| Book value / share | +9.6%/yr | +3.3%/yr |
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- What an owner could take out ($21M) to $30MA range, because the filings do not split maintenance from expansionBetween cash from operations less all capital spending $30M − $51M = ($21M), and cash from operations $30M
What this means
Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.
- Not enough data
What this means
Operating cash flow or the property cost wasn't found in the filing data.
- Not enough data
What this means
No dividends are tagged in the structured data within the record's window — either none were paid, or the filer reports them under a variant tag the pipeline does not yet read. The financing section of the 10-K settles which.
- Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
What this means
Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.
Is it sound?
- Debt / assets 26%ConservativeTotal debt $193M ÷ assets $735MIndustry peers: median 32%
What this means
Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.
- Comfortable(operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest $6M (including $3M charged into development)Industry peers: median 2.0×
What this means
How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. The bill counted here is every dollar of interest the trust incurred, including the part it charged into the cost of buildings under construction rather than against this year's earnings — that money is paid to lenders all the same, and leaving it out flatters exactly the trusts doing the most building. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.
- Consolidated accounts only
What this means
These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | — | $695k | $811k | $9M |
| 2022 | — | $560k | $620k | $11M |
| 2023 | — | $483k | $608k | $22M |
| 2024 | John D. Baker II | $1.2M | $1.2M | $19M |
| 2025 | John D. Baker III | $1.2M | $789k | $18M |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years. A dash under the name means the filing tags the figure without naming the officer.
- Insider ownership24%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
Peers, Specialty REITs
The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Cash marginmedian over the record | Cash / assetsmedian over the record | Dividend / cashmedian over the record | Debt / assetsmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRPMillrose Properties Inc. | $600M | 612%1y | 39.7%1y | 8%1y | 23%1y |
| FPHFive Point Holdings LLC Class A | $110M | -46% | -2.7% | — | 21% |
| LANDGladstone Land Corporation | $88M | 43% | 2.4% | 55% | 54% |
| FPIFarmland Partners Inc. | $52M | 28% | 1.6% | 88% | 45% |
| TRCTejon Ranch Co | $50M | 31% | 2.1% | — | 12% |
| FRPHFRP Holdings Inc. | $43M | 70% | 4.0% | — | 25% |
| SKYHSky Harbour Group Corporation | $28M | -102% | -1.9% | — | 40% |
| MLPMaui Land & Pineapple Company Inc. | $19M | 14% | 4.4% | — | 18%1y |
| Group median | — | 29% | 2.2% | — | 24% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFA reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).
Manual order: ← FROG its page in the Manual FRPT →
Industry order: ← FPI the REITs — Specialty & Diversified chapter FVR →