← All companies ← IQ Manual ITRG → ← GDS Real Estate Development & Services JLL →
IRS, IRSA Investments and Representations Inc.
IRSA is an Argentine real estate company. It owns and rents out shopping malls and other commercial property, and it develops and sells real estate, including housing. Its money comes from rent paid by tenants, from selling developed property, and from changes in the appraised value of the buildings it holds.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- What moves the needle
- The franchise question is whether these malls are places retailers must be in; the test of pricing power is whether rents hold and space stays leased without giving ground, and the filing itself warns the Argentine property business is fragmented, cheap to enter, and short on barriers. Because the buildings are carried at appraised value and the leases run in pesos, the owner is long Argentina — inflation, the peso, and local demand move the result more than management can. It is also a borrower whose notes carry covenants that constrain it, and it can issue shares to fund acquisitions and projects, so the bad case is a leveraged property book repriced down in real terms. Watch what each property earns after inflation and what it costs to hold; the figures are in the record below.
- Is it a good business?
- Operating cash per share has shrunk (−67% a year). The dividend takes 1% of FFO, and is covered. Debt is 19% of assets, conservative for a REIT. The quality and location of the properties, the lease terms and occupancy, and the cost of the debt are what the 10-K settles, and no single ratio captures them.
Drafted from the company's filings and reviewed by hand; every number is shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| ARS 12.9B | ARS 59.7B | ARS 78.2B | ARS 28.0B | ARS 34.9B | ARS 45.9B | ARS 257.0B | ARS 462.5B | ARS 458.1B | ARS 468.5B | ARS 468.5B | RevenueRevenue |
| ARS 9.5B | (ARS 1.1B) | ARS 21.0B | (ARS 55.0B) | ARS 35.1B | (ARS 105.8B) | ARS 276.7B | ARS 312.1B | (ARS 40.6B) | ARS 195.2B | ARS 195.2B | Net incomeNet inc. |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| ARS 1.5B | ARS 7.6B | ARS 9.6B | ARS 560M | ARS 1.2B | ARS 2.3B | ARS 7.5B | ARS 9.8B | ARS 9.1B | ARS 10.5B | ARS 10.5B | DepreciationDeprec. |
| ARS 4.1B | ARS 13.2B | ARS 20.4B | ARS 40.6B | ARS 76.6B | ARS 5.2B | ARS 101.5B | ARS 189.0B | ARS 144.3B | ARS 260.7B | ARS 260.7B | Cash from operationsOp. cash |
| ARS 615M | ARS 147M | ARS 2.6B | ARS 5.9B | ARS 5.6B | ARS 1.2B | ARS 1.4B | ARS 136.4B | ARS 224.8B | — | ARS 2.6B | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| 15% | 1% | 13% | 15% | 7% | 23% | 1% | 72% | 156% | — | 1% | Dividend / operating cashPayout |
| — | ARS 231.2B | ARS 526.9B | ARS 678.4B | ARS 942.1B | ARS 365.3B | ARS 803.7B | ARS 2.64T | ARS 3.13T | ARS 3.36T | ARS 3.36T | Total assetsAssets |
| — | 56% | 61% | 66% | 60% | — | — | — | — | 19% | 19% | Debt / assetsDebt/assets |
| — | ARS 129.4B | ARS 321.5B | ARS 446.7B | ARS 565.0B | ARS 101.9B | ARS 161.1B | ARS 401.0B | ARS 511.3B | ARS 647.1B | ARS 647.1B | Total debtDebt |
| — | ARS 45.9B | ARS 157.2B | ARS 187.7B | ARS 313.2B | ARS 93.5B | ARS 93.8B | ARS 240.7B | ARS 303.6B | ARS 251.5B | ARS 251.5B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| ARS 5.6B | ARS 14.2B | ARS 25.0B | ARS 7.2B | ARS 15.2B | ARS 25.8B | ARS 73.6B | ARS 71.9B | ARS 68.4B | ARS 45.4B | ARS 45.4B | Interest expenseInt. exp. |
| 3.6× | 0.2× | 1.2× | -6.5× | 6.3× | -0.8× | 2.8× | -1.6× | -4.2× | 3.8× | 3.8× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| ARS 89.2B | ARS 25.9B | ARS 61.3B | ARS 45.8B | ARS 85.8B | ARS 101.4B | ARS 342.5B | ARS 1.36T | ARS 1.50T | ARS 1.58T | ARS 1.58T | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 1K | 1K | 1K | 575M | 575M | 550M | 757M | 748M | 742M | 747M | 1K | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| ARS 1069565.22 | ARS 255652.17 | ARS 4483478.26 | ARS 10.33 | ARS 9.78 | ARS 2.16 | ARS 1.87 | ARS 182.32 | ARS 302.97 | — | ARS 3451137.88 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| ARS 155059130.43 | ARS 44980869.57 | ARS 106667826.09 | ARS 79.73 | ARS 149.23 | ARS 184.35 | ARS 452.39 | ARS 1812.67 | ARS 2026.75 | ARS 2112.19 | ARS 2112187416.33 | Book value / shareBVPS |
The diluted share count moved ×1000000 into 2019 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
The diluted share count moved ×1/1000000 into TTM — shares retired, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | −68.8%/yr | +59.6%/yr |
| Owner earnings / share | −93.3%/yr (5-yr) | −93.3%/yr |
| EPS | −70.7%/yr | +33.8%/yr |
| Dividends / share | −64.0%/yr (8-yr) | +96.5%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −94.2%/yr (5-yr) | −94.2%/yr |
| Book value / share | −71.2%/yr | +69.9%/yr |
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Is it a good business?
- What an owner could take out ARS 260.4B to ARS 260.7BA range, because the filings do not split maintenance from expansionBetween cash from operations less all capital spending ARS 260.7B − ARS 307M = ARS 260.4B, and cash from operations ARS 260.7B
What this means
Owner earnings is what a business produces in cash after the spending needed to keep it competitive. For a property trust that spending cannot be read: the filings mix the money that replaces a roof with the money that buys a building, and management decides which is which. Rather than model the split and publish a single figure, the two ends are shown. The upper end is operating cash, which no owner could exceed. The lower end deducts every dollar of capital spending, which is too harsh, since a trust that is growing is charged for buildings it is adding. A trust whose distribution sits near the lower end is paying it out of the properties; one whose distribution exceeds the upper end is paying it from somewhere else.
- Not enough data
What this means
Operating cash flow or the property cost wasn't found in the filing data.
- Lightly coveredDividends ARS 2.6B ÷ cash from operations ARS 260.7B
What this means
A REIT must distribute most of its taxable income, so a high payout is normal and the question is whether the cash covers it. This is a harder test than the industry's usual one: funds from operations adds depreciation back without deducting the capital that genuinely keeps buildings competitive, so a distribution can look covered on that measure and still be funded by borrowing or by selling buildings. Above 100% of operating cash, it is being funded by something other than the properties.
- Withheld — not in the filings' structured data
What this means
Funds from operations is defined by the industry's trade association rather than by accounting rules, and no REIT tags it in the structured data behind this site. Rebuilding it from the standard tags misses the figure these companies report by as much as half, because the gains on property sales it must exclude sit behind each filer's own custom tags. Rather than publish an invented number under the industry's name, the record shows the cash the properties actually produced.
Is it sound?
- Debt / assets 19%ConservativeTotal debt ARS 647.1B ÷ assets ARS 3.36TIndustry peers: median 36%
What this means
Every REIT runs on leverage; how much is the question. Heavy debt is what turns a property downturn into a wipeout, as 2008 showed, so a conservative balance sheet is part of the moat here, not a drag on it.
- Strong(operating income + depreciation) ÷ interest ARS 45.4BIndustry peers: median 2.4×
What this means
How many times the property cash earnings cover the interest bill. The bill counted here is every dollar of interest the trust incurred, including the part it charged into the cost of buildings under construction rather than against this year's earnings — that money is paid to lenders all the same, and leaving it out flatters exactly the trusts doing the most building. Comfortable coverage is what lets a REIT refinance through a tight credit market instead of being forced to sell into one.
- Consolidated accounts only
What this means
These figures are the trust's consolidated accounts. Where a REIT owns buildings through joint ventures it does not control, its share of those properties — and of the debt against them — sits outside every line here, and the filings do not tag it in a form this pipeline can read. Read the equity-method and off-balance-sheet notes in the 10-K before concluding anything about total leverage.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Current Position
as of fiscal year-end, Jun 30, 2025Can the business pay what it owes this year, off the freshest balance sheet: the quality of the assets, the debt actually coming due, and what a low ratio means here.
- Cash & short-term investmentsARS 395.6B
- ReceivablesARS 130.0B
- InventoryARS 1.2B
- Other current assetsARS 36.0B
- Debt due within a yearARS 137.3B
- Accounts payableARS 120.9B
- Other current liabilitiesARS 80.6B
From the company's latest filing.
Peers, Real Estate Development & Services
The same industry, side by side on the REIT lens. Each column names the period it is read over; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Cash marginmedian over the record | Cash / assetsmedian over the record | Dividend / cashmedian over the record | Debt / assetsmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNBROOKFIELD CORPORATION | $75.1B | 10% | 2.0% | 12% | — |
| BPYPMBrookfield Property Partners L.P. | $7.1B | 9% | 0.7% | 303% | 36% |
| CRESYCresud S.A.C.I.F. y A. | $611M | 24% | 4.3% | 17% | 56% |
| OPIOffice Properties Income Trust | $443M | 45% | 5.2% | 87% | 57% |
| VTMXVesta Real Estate Corporation, S.A.B. de C.V. | $283M | 67% | 3.8% | 49% | 29% |
| DUOFangdd Network Group Ltd. | $53M | -17% | -7.8% | — | — |
| ARLAmerican Realty Investors Inc. | $50M | -26% | -1.9% | — | 26% |
| IRSIRSA Investments and Representations Inc. | as filed: ARS 468.5B | 36% | 6.0% | 15% | 60% |
| Group median | — | 17% | 2.9% | 33% | 46% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFEnter the home-market price, not the US ADR quote. IRSA Investments and Representations Inc. reports in ARS, and every figure here (owner earnings, book value, the share count) is on that ARS, ordinary-share basis. Enter the price on the same basis: the local-exchange quote per ordinary share in ARS. A US ADR price in dollars bundles the ADR-to-ordinary ratio and the exchange rate, so it will not reconcile with these figures and would throw the multiple off.
A reit / real estate isn't read on an owner-earnings DCF; its economics live on the balance sheet (book value, the return earned on it, and the cash the assets throw off).
Manual order: ← IQ its page in the Manual ITRG →
Industry order: ← GDS the Real Estate Development & Services chapter JLL →