← All companies ← PFS Manual PG → ← ORC Mortgage & Specialty Finance RKT →
PFSI, PennyMac Financial Services Inc.
We are a specialty financial services firm with a comprehensive mortgage platform and integrated business primarily focused on the production and servicing of U.S. residential mortgage loans.
References in this Report to "we," "our," "us," and the "Company" refer to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
We are also engaged in the management of investments related to the U.S. mortgage market and providing products and services that leverage innovative technologies to effectively and efficiently support our customers.
The business
What it sells, where the money comes from, the kind of company it is.
Next report Est. 10/26–11/5 · the 10-Q for the quarter ended late September · due within 40 days of period end · has filed ~29 days after · the wire records it on arrival
The business in brief
read the 10-K →What this business is and what moves its needle, from its own SEC filings.
- Situation
- Distress / turnaround. Thin interest coverage, or operating cash burned against real debt, across the record. The balance sheet carries this situation; the debt schedule sets the clock. Cyclical. Margins collapse and recover repeatedly across the record; a single year, good or bad, misstates the through-cycle earning power.
- What moves the needle
- Operating margin has run about 53% through the cycle, a wide margin for the work it does — whether that reflects a durable edge or one that can fade is what the record weighs. The operating margin has swung widely — from 23% to 77% over the years — so the through-cycle figure carries more than any single year, and the worst year more than the best. On its own account, the filing leans hardest on pricing power & competition, set against the numbers in what the filing emphasizes, below.
- Is it a good business?
- Return on capital has run in the teens (median 13%, above 15% in 3 of 9 years). Owner earnings, the cash-based check, have been thin too. Returns like these are solid but short of clear franchise economics; whether they hold is what the 10-K settles, not the multiple.
Every line is arithmetic on the company's filings, shown in full in the sections below.
The record
Ten years of arithmetic, read across the cycle.
The record, 2016–2025
realized figures from each filing · older years to the left| 2016’16 | 2017’17 | 2018’18 | 2019’19 | 2020’20 | 2021’21 | 2022’22 | 2023’23 | 2024’24 | 2025’25 | TTMTTMJun 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||||||
| $932M | $955M | $985M | $1.5B | $3.7B | $3.2B | $2.0B | $1.4B | $1.6B | $2.0B | $36M | RevenueRevenue |
| $218M | $270M | $256M | $741M | $2.5B | $1.7B | $1.0B | $821M | $1.2B | $1.5B | $1.5B | Operating incomeOp. inc. |
| 23.4% | 28.2% | 26.0% | 50.2% | 67.8% | 55.2% | 50.4% | 58.6% | 76.6% | 73.9% | n/m | Operating marginOp. mgn |
| $383M | $336M | $268M | $529M | $2.2B | $1.4B | $665M | $184M | $401M | $551M | — | Pretax incomePretax |
| $66M | $101M | $88M | $393M | $1.6B | $1.0B | $476M | $145M | $311M | $501M | $392M | Net incomeNet inc. |
| 12% | 7% | 9% | 26% | 26% | 26% | 29% | 21% | 22% | 9% | 23% | Effective tax rateTax rate |
| Cash flow & returns | |||||||||||
| ($938M) | ($883M) | $572M | ($2.2B) | ($6.2B) | $2.6B | $6.0B | ($1.6B) | ($4.5B) | ($1.7B) | ($1.8B) | Operating cash flowOp. cash |
| $6M | $8M | $13M | $15M | $26M | $29M | $34M | $53M | $56M | $54M | $54M | Depreciation & amortizationD&A |
| ($1.0B) | ($1.0B) | $447M | ($2.7B) | ($7.9B) | $1.5B | $5.5B | ($1.8B) | ($4.9B) | ($2.2B) | ($2.3B) | Working capital & otherWC & other |
| $22M | $7M | $13M | $6M | $11M | $8M | $7M | $1M | $2M | $12M | $16M | CapexCapex |
| 2.3% | 0.7% | 1.4% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.6% | 43.7% | Capex / revenueCapex/rev |
| ($944M) | ($890M) | $559M | ($2.3B) | ($6.2B) | $2.6B | $6.0B | ($1.6B) | ($4.5B) | ($1.7B) | ($1.8B) | Owner earningsOwner earn. |
| −101.3% | −93.2% | 56.8% | −152.4% | −167.6% | 80.7% | 303.5% | −113.0% | −284.6% | −81.3% | n/m | Owner earnings marginOE mgn |
| ($960M) | ($890M) | $559M | ($2.3B) | ($6.2B) | $2.6B | $6.0B | ($1.6B) | ($4.5B) | ($1.7B) | ($1.8B) | Free cash flowFCF |
| −103.0% | −93.2% | 56.8% | −152.4% | −167.6% | 80.7% | 303.5% | −113.0% | −284.6% | −81.3% | n/m | Free cash flow marginFCF mgn |
| — | — | $10M | $10M | $31M | $53M | $55M | $41M | $52M | $63M | $63M | Dividends paidDiv. paid |
| — | $9M | $5M | $1M | $337M | $958M | $406M | $71M | — | $5M | — | BuybacksBuybacks |
| ($35M) | ($339M) | ($323M) | $149M | $783M | ($304M) | ($722M) | ($273M) | ($1.9B) | $552M | — | Investing cash flowInv. cash |
| $967M | $1.2B | ($132M) | $2.1B | $5.8B | ($2.5B) | ($4.3B) | $1.5B | $5.7B | $1.2B | — | Financing cash flowFin. cash |
| ($6M) | ($61M) | $118M | $33M | $344M | ($193M) | $988M | ($390M) | ($700M) | $63M | — | Change in cashΔ cash |
| — | 14% | 6% | 16% | 44% | 21% | 12% | 9% | 11% | 13% | 11% | ROICROIC |
| 5% | 21% | 5% | 19% | 49% | 29% | 14% | 4% | 8% | 12% | 9% | Return on equityROE |
| — | — | 5% | 19% | 48% | 28% | 12% | 3% | 7% | 10% | 8% | Retained to equityRetained/eq |
| Balance sheet | |||||||||||
| $100M | $208M | $274M | $263M | $548M | $347M | $1.3B | $949M | $659M | $712M | $749M | Cash & investmentsCash+inv |
| — | $29M | $33M | $30M | — | $32M | $28M | $19M | $13M | $18M | — | Net PP&ENet PP&E |
| — | $7.4B | $7.5B | $10.2B | $31.6B | $18.8B | $16.8B | $18.8B | $26.1B | $29.4B | $29.9B | Total assetsAssets |
| — | $1.1B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.3B | $3.1B | $3.8B | $4.4B | $5.3B | $6.2B | $6.3B | Total debtDebt |
| — | $927M | $1.4B | $1.2B | $748M | $2.8B | $2.4B | $3.5B | $4.6B | $5.5B | $5.6B | Net debt / (cash)Net debt |
| 2.1× | 1.9× | 1.8× | 3.5× | 9.3× | 4.5× | 3.0× | 1.3× | 1.5× | 1.6× | 1.5× | Interest coverageInt. cov. |
| — | $5.6B | $5.8B | $8.1B | $28.2B | $15.4B | $13.4B | $15.3B | $22.3B | $25.1B | — | Total liabilitiesTotal liab. |
| $1.4B | $469M | $1.7B | $2.1B | $3.4B | $3.4B | $3.5B | $3.5B | $3.8B | $4.3B | $4.3B | Shareholders’ equityEquity |
| 1.7% | 2.2% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 1.3% | 1.8% | 67.6% | Stock comp / revenueSBC/rev |
| Per share | |||||||||||
| 25.5M | 25.0M | 35.3M | 80.3M | 78.7M | 67.5M | 56.0M | 52.7M | 53.4M | 53.9M | 53.5M | Shares out (diluted)Shares |
| $36.48 | $38.22 | $27.88 | $18.39 | $47.07 | $46.94 | $35.49 | $26.58 | $29.87 | $37.98 | $0.68 | Revenue / shareRev/sh |
| $2.59 | $4.03 | $2.48 | $4.89 | $20.92 | $14.87 | $8.50 | $2.74 | $5.84 | $9.30 | $7.33 | EPS (diluted)EPS |
| $-36.96 | $-35.61 | $15.83 | $-28.02 | $-78.87 | $37.87 | $107.70 | $-30.03 | $-84.99 | $-30.88 | $-33.64 | Owner earnings / shareOE/sh |
| $-37.59 | $-35.61 | $15.83 | $-28.02 | $-78.87 | $37.87 | $107.70 | $-30.03 | $-84.99 | $-30.88 | $-33.64 | Free cash flow / shareFCF/sh |
| — | — | $0.28 | $0.12 | $0.39 | $0.78 | $0.98 | $0.79 | $0.98 | $1.16 | $1.18 | Dividends / shareDiv/sh |
| $0.86 | $0.27 | $0.38 | $0.08 | $0.14 | $0.12 | $0.13 | $0.03 | $0.03 | $0.22 | $0.30 | Cap. spending / shareCapex/sh |
| $54.78 | $18.78 | $46.82 | $25.66 | $43.05 | $50.66 | $62.04 | $67.10 | $71.78 | $79.97 | $80.99 | Book value / shareBVPS |
Share counts before 2017 are restated ×1/3 for a stock split, so per-share figures sit on one basis.
The diluted share count moved ×1.41 into 2018 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
The diluted share count moved ×2.27 into 2019 — shares issued, not a split the totals corroborate — and the per-share figures carry the counts as filed.
| 9-yr | 5-yr | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue / share | +0.4%/yr | −4.2%/yr |
| EPS | +15.3%/yr | −15.0%/yr |
| Dividends / share | +22.2%/yr (7-yr) | +24.2%/yr |
| Capital spending / share | −14.0%/yr | +10.3%/yr |
| Book value / share | +4.3%/yr | +13.2%/yr |
Where the cash went
ReinvestBuybacksDividendsAcquisitionsRetainedEach year's operating cash, by what management did with it: the mix, and how it drifts.
Net income is the accountant's number; owner earnings is the cash an owner could take out. The walk between them, off the cash-flow statement, and whether the gap is widening or holding.
In fiscal 2025 the business reported $501M of profit but ($1.7B) of owner earnings: $2.2B less than the profit line, taken out by capital spending and the timing of cash.
| FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2023 | FY2022 | FY2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reported net income | $501M | $311M | $145M | $476M | $1.0B |
| Depreciation & amortizationnon-cash charge added back | +$54M | +$56M | +$53M | +$34M | +$29M |
| Stock-based compensationreal costnon-cash, but a real cost | +$36M | +$21M | +$28M | +$43M | +$38M |
| Working capital & othertiming of cash in and out, other non-cash items | −$2.2B | −$4.9B | −$1.8B | +$5.5B | +$1.5B |
| Cash from operations | ($1.7B) | ($4.5B) | ($1.6B) | $6.0B | $2.6B |
| Capital expenditurecash put back in to keep running and to grow | −$12M | −$2M | −$1M | −$7M | −$8M |
| Owner earnings | ($1.7B) | ($4.5B) | ($1.6B) | $6.0B | $2.6B |
| Owner-earnings marginowner earnings ÷ revenue | -81% | -285% | -113% | 303% | 81% |
Owner earnings is the cash an owner could pull out without starving the business: operating cash less the capital it must spend to hold its position . The cash-flow statement also adds stock comp back as non-cash, but it is a real cost paid in shares; counted as the expense it is (less $36M), owner earnings is nearer ($1.7B).
Much of fiscal 2025's profit didn't arrive as operating cash; it sits in “working capital & other” above. That can be a real inventory or timing swing, or profit that doesn't run through operating cash at all: a heavy tax year, equity-method earnings, or investment income booked through investing. For a year like this, owner earnings understates the cash earned; the full cash-flow statement carries the rest.
Maintenance capex is estimated as depreciation where a growing business invests above it; free cash flow is the figure the scorecard's free-cash margin reads.
Quality & stewardship
Returns, the balance sheet, capital allocation, and pay.
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- ThinOperating income $1.5B ÷ interest expense $961M
What this means
Operating profit covers interest, but with little room. A bad year, a refinancing at higher rates, or a revenue wobble closes the gap fast.
- How heavy is the debt, net of cash? $5.5B · 3.6× operating profitMeaningful net debtCash $302M + ST investments $410M − debt $6.2B
What this means
Netting $712M of cash and short-term investments against $6.2B of debt leaves $5.5B owed, about 3.6× a year's operating profit (4.1× on the gross debt, before the cash). Net debt is the leverage figure that matters: the cash is already set against the debt. Strategic or illiquid investments aren't counted here.
- Not enough data
What this means
The filing data didn't include the inputs for this check.
Is it a good business?
- Solid through the cycle9-yr median, range 6%–44%; 13% latest = NOPAT $1.4B ÷ invested capital $10.2BIndustry peers: median 5%
What this means
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it, Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; a return below the cost of capital (~8%) erodes value as a business grows rather than building it — the test Buffett weighs most. The headline is the median of the last 9 years (it ran 13% most recently), so one peak or trough year doesn't set the verdict. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high, pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Consumes cash through the cycle10-yr median margin, range -285%–303%; latest ($1.7B) = operating cash ($1.7B) − maintenance capex $12MIndustry peers: median 10%
What this means
What an owner could take out without starving the business: operating cash less the maintenance capital it must spend to hold its position — Buffett's owner earnings. That's -81% of revenue this year, a -97% median across 10 years. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $36M of SBC) leaves ($1.7B).
- Are earnings backed by cash? -3.30×Thinly cash-backedCash from ops ($1.7B) ÷ net income $501M
In the filing’s words Read against the cash, reported earnings have run ahead of the operating cash the business generated over the record — about 10% of assets a year, among the widest gaps in the catalogue. For an inventory- or content-heavy grower that can be cash tied up in real assets as it expands; elsewhere it can mean the earnings lean on accounting estimates — the cash-flow statement against the income statement is where to tell which.
What this means
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy, growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- No surplus to allocate
What this means
The business didn't generate positive Owner Earnings this year, so any distributions came from the balance sheet or borrowing, not from operations.
- Investing or harvesting? 0.22×HarvestingCapex $12M ÷ depreciation & amortization as filed $54M
What this means
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth, or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency, or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
The promise and the pay packet
- Is the buyback buying ownership, or mopping up? 1.8%The count is edging downStock compensation $36M (fiscal 2025), 1.8% of revenue · repurchases $5M · diluted shares -3.7% since 2022
What this means
Stock handed to employees is a real cost paid in the owner's own currency: it is charged against profit, but the shares it creates are permanent. Many companies repurchase stock at the same time, which looks like a return of capital and often is not — if the count barely moves, the cash merely cancelled the pay packet and bought the owner nothing. The three states worth telling apart are a count genuinely shrinking, a count standing still despite large repurchases, and a count rising because the issuance was never offset at all.
Graham’s defensive tests · 3 of 4 met
Graham’s numerical criteria for the defensive investor (The Intelligent Investor, ch. 14), run on the filings. A floor of safety, not a buy signal; many fine modern businesses fail his strictest liquidity rules by design.
- Adequate size PassRevenue ≥ $2B · $2.0B
What this means
Big enough to weather a storm. Graham's 1972 floor was ~$100M of sales (≈ $700M today); we use a $2B revenue line as a conservative modern stand-in.
- Strong liquidity —Current ratio ≥ 2× · —
What this means
Current assets / liabilities not in the data yet.
- Earnings stability PassA profit every year (10-yr record) · no losses
What this means
Graham wanted earnings in each of the past ten years, the stability a defensive owner leans on.
- Dividend record MissUninterrupted dividends · 8 of 10 yrs
What this means
An unbroken dividend was Graham's mark of durability. He wanted twenty years; the filings show about ten, and a single suspension breaks the streak. Non-payers, many fine modern compounders, fall outside his defensive net by design.
- Earnings growth PassEarnings +33% over the record · +276%
What this means
At least a third more earnings than a decade ago, averaging three years at each end. Net income (not per-share), so stock splits don't distort it, buybacks and dilution show up in the share-count line instead.
- Moderate price —P/E ≤ 15 and P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 · decided by the price
What this means
Graham's valuation gate, the wall he kept between a sound business and a sound investment. Three-year average earnings are $6.14/share (latest year $9.65), the averaged base the calculator's gate runs on, and book value is $82.94/share. Enter a price in “What the price implies” just below for the P/E, P/B, and whether it clears. But this is the rule Buffett outgrew: there's no hard P/E law, and a wonderful business can deserve a far richer multiple if the thesis holds, treat it as the bargain-hunter's floor, not a verdict on the price.
Durability & moat, 2016–2025
Whether the record’s returns held, and what the capital reinvested earned.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
What this means
Never lost money over the record, the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 3 of 9 yrs
What this means
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year, not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 26% → 70% (3-yr avg ends)
What this means
Through the cycle the operating margin widened — about 26% early to 70% lately, median 50% — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment, incremental ROIC 13%
What this means
Reinvested capital came back at only a modest incremental return — near the cost of capital, where extra growth adds little per dollar. The record shows whether it is a soft stretch or a thinning moat.
- Worst year 2016 · 23.4% op. margin
What this means
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year, the resilience that survives recessions.
- Share count −3.8%/yr
What this means
The share count is shrinking, buybacks are quietly growing your slice of the business.
- Dividend record rising
What this means
Paid and raised the dividend across the record, the continuity Graham prized.
All figures as filed; the source filing is linked above.
Management, ownership & pay
read the proxy →From the proxy: how much of the business the people running it own, and how they are paid, beside what the business earned for its owners in the same years.
| Fiscal year | Chief executive | Pay, as filed | “Actually paid” | Owner earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mr. Spector | $13.6M | $17.3M | $2.6B |
| 2022 | Mr. Spector | $9.7M | $6.5M | $6.0B |
| 2023 | Mr. Spector | $7.3M | $14.5M | ($1.6B) |
| 2024 | Mr. Spector | $10.6M | $9.6M | ($4.5B) |
| 2025 | Mr. Spector | $12.7M | $17.7M | ($1.7B) |
Both pay figures are the company’s own, from the pay-versus-performance table its proxy statement files. “As filed” is the Summary Compensation Table total: salary, bonus, and equity awards at their value on the day of grant. “Actually paid” is the SEC’s prescribed recalculation, which re-marks those equity awards to what they became as they vested; it can swing far above or below the filed figure in either direction, and negative years occur. Owner earnings are the whole business's, from the record above, for the same fiscal years.
- Insider ownership15.2%
The stake all directors and executive officers hold together, per the 2026 proxy: skin in the game, the first thing Munger reads.
- CEO pay ratio147:1
What the chief earns for every dollar the median employee makes, per the 2026 proxy. A high ratio alone settles nothing; some businesses are genuinely top-heavy in scarce skill. A runaway figure is where Buffett starts asking whether the board is doing its job.
- Stock-based compensation$36M
The slice of the business handed to employees in shares in fiscal 2025, 1.8% of revenue, equal to 2.4% of operating profit. Buffett's oldest accounting fight: this is compensation, compensation is an expense, real whether or not the headline earnings admit it. One trap: the cash-flow statement adds SBC back, so the operating cash, and the owner earnings drawn from it, are flattered by exactly this amount; counted as the cost it is, what an owner keeps is lower.
Peers, Mortgage & Specialty Finance
The same industry, side by side on owner economics. Each column names the period it is read over, and a median resting on fewer than three years carries that count beside it; the group median at the foot is the line to read each figure against.
| Company | Revenuelatest FY, USD | Gross marginmedian over the record | Op. marginmedian over the record | ROICmedian over the record | Owner earn. marginmedian over the record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWMCUWM Holdings Corporation | $3.2B | — | 14.8% | 8% | -86% |
| PFSIPennyMac Financial Services Inc. | $2.0B | — | 52.8% | 13% | -97% |
| TREELendingTree Inc. | $1.1B | 96%1y | 4.8% | 7% | 10% |
| ONITOnity Group Inc. | $1.1B | — | 41.0% | 2%1y | 15% |
| FIGRFigure Technology Solutions Inc. | $507M | — | 2.7% | 4% | — |
| Group median | — | — | 14.8% | 7% | -38% |
The price
What a price has to assume.
What the price implies
reverse-DCFPennyMac Financial Services Inc. is profitable, but owner earnings are negative this year because capital spending currently outruns operating cash, a build-out, so the owner-earnings reverse-DCF has no positive base to grow. We read the price from both ends instead: type a price to see the steady-state profitability it demands, then set the mature margin you would believe and weigh the two against each other. Nothing leaves your browser unless you enter it in your notebook.
Revenue, delivered−14%/yr’20→’25
Enter a price to run it.
A dated snapshot of the price you typed, the assumptions you set, and what the page showed for them. A snapshot is never edited after it is saved. Your notebook is yours alone — the commitment states what is stored and what we will never do.
Two reads of one future. From your price: the owner earnings the company must reach, valued at a mature multiple and discounted back at your rate, expressed as the margin it implies on revenue grown at your rate. From your belief: the mature margin you would credit, set on the dial above. When the margin the price demands runs above the one you would believe, you are paying for a future taken on faith. For a deep cyclical at a trough, normalized through-cycle earnings are the better lens; this mode is for the genuinely unprofitable, and for the profitable business whose capital spending currently outruns its cash.
Manual order: ← PFS its page in the Manual PG →
Industry order: ← ORC the Mortgage & Specialty Finance chapter RKT →